A Senate committee has backed two bills intended to help expand access to high-speed internet in underserved parts of the state, but the AARP has expressed concern that one of the measures weakens consumer protections.

Senate Bill 442 would require the Department of General Service to complete an inventory of state-owned property to determine where telecommunications companies might be able to install towers and other infrastructure to improve high-speed internet for nearby homes and residences, said state Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill, R-York County, the chairwoman of the Senate Communications and Technology Committee.

The issue has emerged as a daunting challenge even as lawmakers have spent years acknowledging that federal data on broadband access in Pennsylvania is grossly misleading.

A 2019 study commissioned by the Center for Rural Pennsylvania concluded that every county in the state had at least one area that suffered from inadequate internet speeds.

Senate Bill 341 would roll back regulations on land-line phone companies to try to help those companies reinvest in deploying the infrastructure to make high-speed internet more widely available, she said. Phillips-Hill has been one of the lawmakers leading the push in the General Assembly to tackle the issue of broadband access. She is the prime sponsor of both bills, which were approved by the committee by 7-3 votes on Tuesday.

State Sen. John Kane, D-Chester County, the Democratic chairman of the Communications and Technology Committee, spoke out against both bills.

He noted that the unions representing communications workers and the AARP have opposed SB 341 and said that the Public Utility Commission has begun work on updating the phone companies’ regulations.

“Let the PUC finish the job they have started,” he said.

Phillips-Hill said the PUC has been moving too slow on updating the regulations and as the commission’s delayed action, the number of people using land-line phones has continued to dwindle — land-line phones now only represent about 9% of the market, she said.

The AARP has opposed the legislation, saying that it would force customers to make complaints to the companies instead of the PUC and “relegating the PUC to a ‘mediator’ role only after the consumer has gone through the provider,” Teresa Osbourne, advocacy manager for the AARP in Pennsylvania said in a letter spelling out the group’s opposition. “This is simply not acceptable.”

The AARP backed Phillips-Hill’s other bill though.

“All Pennsylvanians must be able to rely on the availability of affordable and high-quality communications services,” Osbourne said. “Without it, communities suffer as opportunities for local businesses to prosper and for people to learn, find jobs, and stay healthy are lost.”

Phillips-Hill said that under HB 442, after the state completes its survey of properties, when telecommunications lease space on state property, the revenue would be designated to help fund broadband deployment elsewhere. As a result, if a state property in a densely populated area attracts a lease deal from a telecommunications company, “that money can be repurposed” to pay for broadband projects in underserved areas, she said.

With the committee's approval, both measures now go to the full Senate for consideration.

John Finnerty reports from the Harrisburg Bureau for the New Castle News and other Pennsylvania newspapers owned by CNHI. Email him at and follow him on Twitter @cnhipa.


Trending Video

CNHI PA State Reporter

John Finnerty reports from the Harrisburg Bureau for the New Castle News and other Pennsylvania newspapers owned by CNHI. Email him at and follow him on Twitter @cnhipa.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.