NEW CASTLE —
So now what?
Last week’s vote by the New Castle school board to kill the Lockley school consolidation project — followed by the decision of superintendent George Gabriel to resign — leaves a lot of questions in the city school system.
And it leaves a fair amount of anger, frustration and confusion.
For a couple of years now, the district has been moving haltingly toward a major expansion and renovation of the Lockley elementary school. The project would coincide with the closing of other elementary schools in the district, essentially creating a single elementary facility in New Castle.
A key factor in this proposal is the deteriorating condition of the district’s elementary schools. Members of the administration have said that based on funding formulas and assorted expenses, it would be more cost effective over time to pursue new construction at Lockley and close the other schools than to make repairs and renovations.
But this plan never enjoyed unanimous public — or board — support. Considerable skepticism exists over the notion of building a new school in New Castle, where student population has experienced a long decline with no reversal of this trend in sight.
Plus, there are still residents who are unhappy with the decision to demolish and replace the old New Castle High School. The new structure is now running at about 60 percent of capacity, which adds to doubts about additional construction.
Final approval for the Lockley plan hit a snag when bids came in higher than anticipated. After the project was massaged a bit, a second round of bidding brought back numbers closer to the mark at roughly $23 million.
But this failed to impress a majority on the board. And by a 5-4 vote last week, the Lockley project was rejected.
In reaction to that — along with indications some board members were looking for a change at the top of the administration — Gabriel submitted a pre-written letter of resignation. Without fanfare, the same five members who shot down the Lockley plan accepted Gabriel’s departure, effective Jan. 31.
So is the Lockley project truly kaput? That’s difficult to say. While some board members have been adamantly opposed to it, others have been inconsistent. Maybe they’ll switch again. Maybe not.
What I do know is the Lockley opponents now constitute the majority on the school board. And they owe it to the public to explain where they stand and what’s going to happen now. They were oddly silent on these matters at least week’s meeting.
Whatever one thinks of this proposal, last week’s vote was a big deal on very serious and expensive matters. The district has spent about $1.5 million on architectural and other preparatory work leading up to the actual construction. The vote vaporizes this money.
What do taxpayers think about that?
Obviously, if the project was not to be pursued, this money never should have been spent. It represents poor planning and poor leadership.
Speaking of which, I think blame for the current mess can be spread around. Only token efforts were conducted by the administration and construction supporters to bring the public or the larger community into the fold. Five votes on the board were deemed to be sufficient.
So now we have a divided, angry board and a divided, angry public. And because matters pertaining to the New Castle school district are steadfastly avoided by other local officials and entities, I’m wondering where the leadership is going to come from to resolve this mess.
NEW CASTLE —
So now what?
Up through the ground comes education cash
Democrats running for governor seem to be competing to convince voters they will dip deepest into the pockets of gas drillers to replace $1 billion that Gov. Tom Corbett has cut from education spending.
Charter school petitions court with signatures
The New Castle Arts Academy Charter School has petitioned the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas for an appeal.
Schools wait years to receive state’s share of construction bills
More than 200 school building projects are awaiting money from the state — in some cases months and years after they cleared all other hurdles of Pennsylvania’s approval process.
Vo-tech staffers receive Pride and Promise awards
The Lawrence County Career and Technical Center’s joint operating committee has presented Pride and Promise awards to two employees.
Official sorting out vo-tech finances
Second of two parts: The Lawrence County Career and Technical Center is plowing through a financial quagmire with help from the Laurel School District.
Overtime pay the crux of vo-tech forensic audit
First of two parts: Lawrence County Career and Technical Center’s former assistant business manager allegedly logged overtime while on vacation, an audit report shows.
Audit report details alleged discrepancies
Forensic auditors examining Lawrence County’s vocational-technical school funds focused on overtime pay of the assistant business manager.
Audit shows more than overtime issues
A forensic audit of the Lawrence County Career and Technical Center finances turned up more than alleged unauthorized overtime pay.
Our Opinion: Recording executive sessions will limit abuse
Whenever governing bodies have public meetings, they often opt to conduct executive sessions.This is perfectly legal under Pennsylvania law — so long as the basic purpose for the executive session is explained to the public and so long as officials refrain from discussing matters in private that are required to be addressed in the open.
State sponsoring dog license poster contest
The state Department of Agriculture is inviting students to enter a poster contest about the importance of dog licensing. The contest is open to all Pennsylvania students of grades 1 through 6, enrolled in public, private or home schooled children. The entry deadline is April 30.
- More Schools Headlines
- Up through the ground comes education cash