New Castle News

Hot Topics

October 10, 2012

Our Opinion: Sandusky jail term protects children and sends a message

NEW CASTLE — There probably isn’t much new to say about the Jerry Sandusky saga at this point.

However, yesterday’s sentencing of Sandusky to 30 to 60 years in prison — essentially a life term — for his conviction on child sex abuse charges, warrants additional comment.

Although Sandusky’s case has attracted massive public attention, it remains difficult to fathom that an institution such as Penn State University could allow itself to be placed in its current predicament.

Several members of the school’s leadership, including former president Graham Spanier and the late, legendary football coach Joe Paterno, have been widely discredited for failure to deal more effectively with reports of Sandusky’s horrific crimes.

Plus some officials are awaiting trial, and ongoing investigations could lead to new charges. On top of that, civil suits are pending and the university will continue to deal with the consequences of the Sandusky saga for years to come.

We understand that sexual predators are often repeat offenders, seemingly incapable of controlling their actions. And in the case of Sandusky, part of that appears to include utter denial of what has happened.

Despite the overwhelming evidence and testimony against him, despite revelations that concerns about his conduct have existed for years, he continued to plead his innocence at his sentencing. There is no remorse here, and if putting Sandusky away for the rest of his life is what it takes to protect more children, so be it.

We continue to hold out the hope that the scrutiny surrounding the case of Sandusky and Penn State will lead to a few positives. In particular, we would like to think that the results of the case — delayed as they might have been — will encourage other victims of sexual abuse to come forward and fight back.

It’s important to remember that these predators don’t quit; they merely move on. So they must be stopped.

But we also have stressed the need for institutions and the people who lead them to learn from what happened to Penn State. While this may be an extreme case, there is a human tendency to look the other way when something wrong occurs. Ignore it and it will go away, so to speak.

Maybe that happens at times, but not always — as Sandusky’s case amply demonstrates. And the more serious the problem that’s downplayed, the greater the consequences will be when it’s exposed.

What’s the old saying? Honesty is the best policy. We imagine plenty of people at Penn State these days wish it had been followed with Sandusky.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Hot Topics
  • brown.jpg Prosecutors granted stay in Jordan Brown decision

    A hearing on the status of a boy accused in a 2009 fatal shooting has been canceled. The hearing on 15-year-old Jordan Brown’s detention had been planned for Lawrence County Court today, but was canceled after prosecutors requested, and received, a stay in the proceedings.

    May 13, 2013 1 Photo

  • Krastek.jpg Jordan Brown Case: Next step unclear, attorneys say

    The Jordan Brown case has stretched into its fifth year. But it is not over yet. And the lawyers representing the 15-year-old don’t know exactly what will happen next.

    May 10, 2013 1 Photo 1 Story

  • Jordan Brown Case: Victim’s parents ‘devastated’ by ruling

    Kenzie Houk’s parents are devastated — again. The first time was when she was fatally shot in February, 2009. The second time was Wednesday, when they learned of a ruling by the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

    May 10, 2013

  • brown.jpg Appeals court overturns Jordan Brown ruling

    A Pennsylvania appeals court has overturned the Jordan Brown decision in Lawrence County. As a result, a new juvenile proceeding will be needed for the now-15-year-old accused in the 2009 shooting death of his father’s pregnant fiancée, Kenzie Houk.

    May 9, 2013 1 Photo

  • harness.jpg Local officials keep hope alive for track

    Penn National Gaming’s plans to proceed with an Austintown racetrack has not killed hopes for a Lawrence County track/casino. “We’re still in a holding pattern,” state Sen. Elder Vogel Jr. said.

    May 3, 2013 1 Photo

  • harness.jpg Ohio gives Penn National the go-ahead

    The Ohio Racing Commission Wednesday gave Penn National Gaming the green light to relocate two racetracks. The approval was unanimous to transfer a thoroughbred racetrack from Columbus to Austintown and a harness track from Toledo to Dayton.

    May 2, 2013 1 Photo

  • Ohio tracks still waiting for design decision

    The wait for a racetrack in Austintown continues. The Ohio State Racing Commission members Tuesday agreed to extend the time it will take to reach a decision on the design of racetracks proposed by Penn National Gaming Inc.

    April 17, 2013

  • money.jpg Authority to vote on Citigroup for track bond issue

    A county authority will vote publicly on an underwriter for a revenue bond issue for a proposed racetrack. The Lawrence County Industrial Development Authority will meet at 10 a.m. April 24 at the Lawrence County Economic Development Corp. office to act on the county commissioners’ recommendation of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as the lending institution for a revenue bond.

    April 17, 2013 1 Photo

  • money.jpg Citigroup to underwrite county’s track financing

    Citigroup has been chosen to underwrite the county’s share of financing for the racetrack/casino proposed for Mahoning Township. The bank will issue bonds or notes to finance part of the $400 million project proposed for Lawrence County.

    April 10, 2013 1 Photo

  • money.jpg Ohio’s demands to delay Penn National progress

    Penn National Gaming will have another six months to meet Ohio Racing Commission demands. In a special meeting yesterday, commission members asked Penn National to redesign the $125 million racetrack set for Austintown.

    March 28, 2013 1 Photo

Community Calendar
Loading…
Events by eviesays.com
House Ads
Poll

The Lawrence County commissioners have decided to solicit proposals for the private operation of the county jail. Good idea?

Yes. If it’s a more efficient way to run the jail, I’m all for it.
No. I think there would be too many questions of liability for the county.
Not sure. The county seems to be doing a good job of running the jail now. Why break it if it’s not broken?
     View Results
Poll

The Lawrence County commissioners have decided to solicit proposals for the private operation of the county jail. Good idea?

Yes. If it’s a more efficient way to run the jail, I’m all for it.
No. I think there would be too many questions of liability for the county.
Not sure. The county seems to be doing a good job of running the jail now. Why break it if it’s not broken?
     View Results