It’s the goal of all politicians: Find a way to generate tax revenue without angering voters.
It’s the goal of all civic do-gooders: Find a way to encourage more people to show up at the polls on election day.
Well, I think I’ve come up with an idea that manages to kill two birds with the same fiendishly clever stone.
Both of the above-mentioned problems have been addressed, in some fashion or another, over the years — but with limited success. For instance, Washington’s politicians are actually cutting taxes while they increase spending.
How? By ballooning the deficit. There is indeed a cost to this, a terrible and painful cost in fact. But most voters won’t notice until the bills come due. And that’s a few years down the road.
Officials in New Castle have hit upon the scheme of ever-earlier retirements for employees. This allows costs to be shifted from the general fund to the pension fund, which is covered in large part by a special wage tax imposed on all people who work in the city, residents or not.
Non-residents, of course, can’t vote in city elections. Gotcha!
As for voter turnout, we all know it tends to fall somewhere between embarrassing and appalling. Advocates of good government and citizen involvement routinely propose new ideas — Internet voting, same-day registration, etc., to boost turnout.
Typically, these moves are designed to make voting easier. That they cheapen the process and decrease the need to seriously think about candidates and issues is conveniently overlooked.
So how did I manage to develop a concept that solves both of these problems at once? Actually, it’s so simple, so foolproof I’m amazed it isn’t already in effect.
Years ago, many states had what was called a poll tax. In order to vote, you had to pay a tax. The intent was to discourage poor people — especially poor black people — from voting.
Poll taxes are now prohibited in America. But what about about a non-poll tax?
Instead of taxing people who vote, why not tax those who don’t vote? Send every citizen 18 or over a tax bill — say for $100 — every time he or she fails to show up for a general election.
It’s perfect. Not only would the tax draw more people to the polls, it would also generate money from those who don’t go. And here’s the beautiful part: The politicians have no need to worry about these disgruntled taxpayers, because they don’t vote. Why care what they think?
Some non-voters might object, trying to argue there is some constitutional right to refrain from voting. They’ll claim the decision not to cast a ballot is a form of protest protected by the First Amendment.
But I don’t think this will fly. Such individuals would still be able to turn in a blank ballot, or write in phony names, if they reject all candidates or the system in general. To avoid the tax, all they would really have to do is show up at the polls on election day.
That’s not a violation of any right. It’s certainly not as onerous as jury duty.
So all of you politicians and good citizenship advocates there, feel free to take this idea and run with it.
For everyone else, remember to vote tomorrow.
Closer Look
Related Photos
Discussion
Mitchel Olszak: Hey, how about a special tax on people who don't vote?
- Closer Look
-
-
Photo Gallery, Story: Super Brew raises $46,000 for American Cancer Society
It’s a winning combination: raising a glass and funds at the same time. That was the opportunity at the third annual Super Brew, which offered participants the chance to sample more than 5o craft beers and to support the American Cancer Society’s Relay for Life.
-
Our Opinion: City hurts businesses by ticketing during lunch hours
Most of the candidates running (and now elected) for New Castle City Council and mayor last year said they believed downtown redevelopment was important. This was a common theme during editorial board meetings at the New Castle News prior to last spring’s primary and before the general election.
-
Racing switch in Ohio shouldn’t affect local plans
Converting the proposed Austintown track from harness to thoroughbred racing won’t affect the plans for Lawrence County’s racetrack. But the inactivity of the local license holder might.
-
Lori Brothers: Get connected for better health
I am always happy when I see the lifesaving value of connection happening around me. It makes my heart smile when many people spontaneously unite. There is a feeling of excitement and community. Everyone gets onto the same page, when often the pages are scattered.
-
Mohawk students study at children’s center
Six Mohawk High school seniors are gaining extra knowledge outside the classroom. The students are participating in projects this term at the Oh Wow! Roger and Gloria Jones Children’s Center for Science and Technology in Youngstown.
-
Lincoln to stage Shakespeare send-up
Lincoln High School will present the play “I Hate Shakespeare” at 7 p.m. tomorrow and Thursday in the auditorium. The play takes a comedic look at some of William Shakespeare’s greatest plays, such as “Hamlet,” “Romeo and Juliet” and “Macbeth.”
-
Best Super Bowl ad? Vote for your favorite
Naked M&Ms, an out-of-shape dog on a mission and Clint Eastwood delivering a passionate speech about American adversity -- these are among the favorite commercials that aired during Sunday's Super Bowl.
-
SLIDESHOW: Giants beat Patriots in Super Bowl XLVI
The New York Giants won their fourth NFL championship Sunday in Indianapolis, scoring in the final minute to defeat New England 21-17.
-
Sneak peek at this year's hottest Super Bowl ads
The Super Bowl is a must-watch TV event, if not for the outcome of the biggest football game of the year, then at least for the multi-million dollar commercials that run throughout. And this year’s buzzworthy spots include celebrity appearances, homages to movies and lots of humor.
-
VIDEO: NFL Experience a hit with Super Bowl fans
The NFL's interactive theme park pre-sold more than 65,000 tickets for Super Bowl week and has become the destination of choice for visitors to Indianapolis.
- More Closer Look Headlines
-
