NEW CASTLE —
Back in the 2000 presidential election, Americans received a civics lesson of sorts.
Much of it involved obscure terms such as hanging and dimpled chads, as well as butterfly ballots. All of this, of course, came courtesy of Florida, whose clumsy election efforts produced an extended period of uncertainty in the presidential contest between George W. Bush and Al Gore.
Bush eventually was declared the winner of the election, courtesy of a Supreme Court ruling in his favor. But when all the dust — and chads — settled, Gore won the popular vote while Bush won the White House.
This occurred because Bush captured the most votes nationally in the Electoral College, which actually selects the president. Each state names electors to cast votes for president. The number of electors in a state is the total of its members in the House and Senate.
In most states, the Electoral College is a winner-take-all situation. Because Bush won Florida by a handful of popular votes, he succeeded in capturing all the state’s electoral votes. That put Bush ahead of Gore in the electoral contest.
While this isn’t the first time in American history that the winner of the popular vote failed to win the electoral vote, the 2000 results prompted many Democrats to push for reforms. Specifically, they wanted the Electoral College abolished and replaced with a presidential selection process based strictly on popular vote.
But that effort faded, because doing away with the Electoral College would involve amending a Constitution. In a nation that strives for instant gratification, that’s too much like work.
But suddenly, the Electoral College is a hot topic again. But this time, it’s Republicans who are demanding changes. But rather than amending the Constitution, they are trying to do it state by state.
The Constitution allows states to determine the specific method of awarding electoral votes, and a move is afoot in certain states to effectively split those votes between the candidates.
One Republican plan in Pennsylvania, for instance, would have given most of the commonwealth’s electoral votes to Mitt Romney in 2012, even though Barack Obama won the state’s popular vote.
GOP lawmakers in Pennsylvania and elsewhere say their goal is to create fairness in the presidential election process and give more people a voice. But let’s be blunt: This is a raw political move; an attempt to thwart a general Democratic trend in some key states.
And Republicans would do this by damaging their own states. Pennsylvania, for instance, is a competitive state where Republicans and Democrats vie for a big electoral prize. But if the electoral vote is divided, the value of campaigning in the commonwealth fades. Pennsylvania wouldn’t matter much in the presidential contest.
Politicians who say they want to make the presidential selection process fairer and more reflective of popular sentiment already have a means of doing so. Some states have agreed to participate in a compact to award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. So far, eight states and the District of Columbia have agreed to join this compact.
This compact would take effect only when states representing a majority of electoral votes join. It would be a nonpartisan way to ensure the candidate who wins the presidency is the one who captures the most voter support.
This is a reform that takes no sides and favors no party. Anything else is a gimmick.
Closer Look
Related Photos
-
Mitchel Olszak, Dear Reader
Discussion
Mitchel Olszak: Pennsylvanians shouldn’t be fooled by electoral hijinks
- Closer Look
-
-
John K. Manna: Data shows decline in number of primary voters
Voter participation isn’t what it used to be. That’s nothing new, but there has been a significant drop in voting here in Lawrence County. And it’s happened suddenly, particularly in the so-called “off-year” elections.
-
Primary 2013: School board candidate tops campaign spending
Historically, spending by school board candidates has paled in comparison to those running for other local offices. But not this year, at least with one candidate — George J. Gabriel.
-
On the Record: A listing of today’s police items and district judge reports
On the Record is a periodic update of public information coming out of the Lawrence County Government Center and local police departments. Look inside for the latest listing of police items and district judge reports.
-
Lawmakers looking at special education funding
The state hands out special education dollars under a flawed formula that gives schools the same amount of money, regardless of how many students need services or how intense and costly those services are, lawmakers said.
-
Our Opinion: We endorse candidates for New Castle board
The New Castle school district is often a study in contrasts. There are complaints about the district on everything from taxes to nepotism, from test scores to ethical slights. Yet at the same time, plenty of students within the district excel. It’s a tribute to the hard work of those students, their families and the educators who support them.
-
Our Opinion: You should be frightened, outraged by IRS abuse of power
When people talk about government posing a threat to citizens, a common topic these days is unmanned drones. But a more credible threat may be the Internal Revenue Service. This agency, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing related rules, has the ability to make life miserable for the average individual.
-
Supervisors undecided on radio tower
The Neshannock Township fire department is waiting for the supervisors to decide whether it will get a new radio tower. Chairman Ralph Sheen said at Tuesday’s supervisors meeting he had gone to look at the tower on the Clen-Moore station after being told it is in disrepair.
-
Mahoning to be paid for Edinburg easement
Mahoning Township will get $53,000 for an easement on property in Edinburg. The supervisors unanimously approved a contract Tuesday allowing Pennant Midstream — a Marcellus Shale oil and gas development company — to run 100 feet of pipe through township-owned property off First Street.
-
Shenango board not raising taxes
The Shenango Area School Board has introduced a $15.8 million budget that requires no tax increase. The $15,819,792 spending plan for the 2013-14 school year is $43,012 higher than the current budget.
-
Shenango hires three teachers
The Shenango Area School Board hired three elementary teachers for the 2013-14 school year. They are:
- More Closer Look Headlines
-
