NEW CASTLE —
By now, I’m starting to feel like that little girl in the YouTube video.
You know, the one where she’s sobbing because she’s tired of hearing about the presidential campaign. Her mother seeks to console her with the fact it’s almost over.
Well, it is almost over. And not just the presidential contest. We have been hammered by advertising from campaigns for assorted offices in state and federal government. It’s enough to bring you to tears.
It’s not that I’m easily shocked. I’ve been in the news business for a few decades now, observing what I call the “silly season” around election time. As the voting draws near, the campaigns grow more desperate.
And more cynical. The negative advertising we’ve been subjected to this year is nothing short of appalling. When I see or hear these ads, either on the air or in print, I conclude they tell us much more about the people behind them than the candidates they are attacking.
I would like to think voters are turned off as much as I am by these ads, but campaigns still produce them. Their research must conclude that they work.
But I think they are disgraceful and repugnant. And along with becoming increasingly ugly, these ads also are increasingly distorting the truth.
It’s obvious to me that winning is more important to many candidates than winning with honor. The campaign smear is alive and well, and it’s leaving a growing stain on the nation’s political system.
An old saying — attributed to baseball great Casey Stengel — observes that sports doesn’t build character but instead exposes character. The same could be said of any form of competition, campaigns included. Sadly, the advertising we get speaks poorly of those who say they want to serve us.
Here at the New Castle News, we often are on the periphery of these bitter campaigns, as the candidates seek every advantage. They hope their attacks on opponents will become part of news stories, while they are likely to object to material in the paper that puts them in less than positive light.
That includes endorsements editorials. We often hear nothing from candidates the paper endorses, and that’s fine. Editorial endorsements are intended to serve our readers, not be viewed as favors to recommended candidates.
But we do, at times, hear from candidates who aren’t endorsed, as they take exception to that fact and go about critiquing the newspaper’s opinion. Yet come Election Day, all candidates will receive plenty of non-endorsements from voters. That’s the way it goes.
With each election cycle, as more and more money flows into campaigns, Americans will be forced to endure increasing amounts of negative advertising. The only way to stop it is for voters to demand cleaner campaigns. It won’t happen automatically.
Closer Look
Related Photos
-
Mitchel Olszak, Dear Reader
Related Links
Discussion
Mitchel Olszak: Negative campaign advertising overwhelms process
- Closer Look
-
-
Photo Gallery: Some powerful and heartbreaking images from tornado aftermath
Oklahoma City-based AP photographer Sue Ogrocki was at the Plaza Towers Elementary School, which was destroyed, and saw rescuers pulling children out of the rubble. This is her account of what she witnessed, including some of her most powerful — and heartbreaking — images.
-
Photo Gallery, Story: Laurel senior county’s new dairy princess
The two candidates cross their fingers and the crowd goes silent, awaiting the verdict. And the 2013-2014 Lawrence County Dairy Princess is — Rhonda Mitcheltree!
-
In The Schools: Keystone Exam could up graduation stakes
The typical Pennsylvania student will spend more than 46 hours taking standardized state tests during his or her academic career. That equals more than a week’s worth of school and does not take into account the amount of time that schools spend specifically preparing for tests or helping students who have failed standardized tests.
-
Are We Ready? Funds from all levels help prepare for disaster
Local fire and police departments and ambulances services spend countless hours training to prepare for manmade or natural disasters. This all breaks down to money for equipment, man hours and training costs.
-
John K. Manna: Data shows decline in number of primary voters
Voter participation isn’t what it used to be. That’s nothing new, but there has been a significant drop in voting here in Lawrence County. And it’s happened suddenly, particularly in the so-called “off-year” elections.
-
Primary 2013: School board candidate tops campaign spending
Historically, spending by school board candidates has paled in comparison to those running for other local offices. But not this year, at least with one candidate — George J. Gabriel.
-
On the Record: A listing of today’s police items and district judge reports
On the Record is a periodic update of public information coming out of the Lawrence County Government Center and local police departments. Look inside for the latest listing of police items and district judge reports.
-
Lawmakers looking at special education funding
The state hands out special education dollars under a flawed formula that gives schools the same amount of money, regardless of how many students need services or how intense and costly those services are, lawmakers said.
-
Our Opinion: We endorse candidates for New Castle board
The New Castle school district is often a study in contrasts. There are complaints about the district on everything from taxes to nepotism, from test scores to ethical slights. Yet at the same time, plenty of students within the district excel. It’s a tribute to the hard work of those students, their families and the educators who support them.
-
Our Opinion: You should be frightened, outraged by IRS abuse of power
When people talk about government posing a threat to citizens, a common topic these days is unmanned drones. But a more credible threat may be the Internal Revenue Service. This agency, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing related rules, has the ability to make life miserable for the average individual.
- More Closer Look Headlines
-
