NEW CASTLE —
If you want to gain an appreciation for great thinkers, read some of history’s major political philosophies.
Here you will find the works of Plato, Machiavelli, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, St. Augustine and many others. They explored difficult social issues and offered serious insight.
But if you analyze these political works, inevitably a question arises: How could these brilliant minds come to so many different conclusions about individuals and government structure?
Various explanations for this can be found. But it’s mainly because these philosophers were products of their times. The events they observed and encountered helped to forge their outlooks on life and their views on politics.
Yet times and perceptions evolve. That raises problems for those looking for help from great ideas in the past. Maybe those ideas derived from events that are no longer pertinent.
With this observation in mind, it’s easier to dismiss Plato’s embrace of the state and its dominance over the individual. Plato believed in a vibrant political culture, full of debate and exchange of ideas. Yet at the end of the day, he accepted adherence to the dictates of the state. This, Plato determined, was essential for civilization to survive.
It’s a notion that clashes with the concept of a free society, where individual action and innovation is something to celebrate and promote. Americans might take Plato’s conclusions and decide he was a fool.
But this ignores the times Plato lived in. He appreciated government and the rule of law, because he was well aware of the chaos and brutality that could exist outside of its protection.
Today, plenty of people complain about government. Much of it is typical human grumbling about things that don’t go right. However, some of it stems from a view that government is the cause of our problems, not a potential for solution.
When you look at today’s gridlock in Washington, and the utter inability of politicians to hammer out practical agreements on matters pertaining to budgets and taxes, you can understand how people can give up on government. This level of incompetence — and it is incompetence, not principled partisanship — fuels individuals who think it’s best to privatize all aspects of government, buy some guns and embrace self-sufficiency.
Yet a fundamental mistake is made today by many people who criticize government. They overlook the fact they are criticizing themselves. Even for Plato, politics and government weren’t some far-off system of arbitrary authority. They derived from the active participation of citizens who shaped government to fit their needs.
And despite the passage of millennia, this hasn’t changed. Government is a tool we control. When it fails to do our bidding — and we refuse to demand better — who’s to blame?
Mitchel Olszak
Related Photos
-
Mitchel Olszak, Dear Reader
Discussion
Mitchel Olszak: Political lessons from distant past hold value today
- Mitchel Olszak
-
-
Mitchel Olszak: Excuses for data sweep sound hollow
Perhaps 2013 will go down as the year privacy and civil liberties became too inconvenient for government. Listening to assorted officials defend massive programs that scoop up vast amounts of data certainly gives that impression.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Casino satire comes to fruition
Several years ago, I wrote a satirical column about government subsidizing casinos. In it, I envisioned a time in the future when casinos became so prevalent that the gambling market was glutted with them.
-
Mitchel Olszak: The challenge in life is to make certain that we live it
Many years ago, I worked as a reporter covering the police beat. The job involved a paper in a small town. And while much of this news consisted of burglaries, fights, drunk driving arrests, etc., I would get the occasional call for a fatality.
-
Mitchel Olszak: State records reveal water problems with gas well drilling
The drilling of shale gas in Lawrence County and the rest of Pennsylvania holds great promise. It also holds the potential for harm. Depending on who you ask, health and environmental concerns about shale gas drilling are either very real or very overblown.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Snooping threat to the free press
In “All the President’s Men,” reporter Bob Woodward conducts late-night meetings with a source in a parking garage. That source, Deep Throat (later revealed to be high-ranking FBI official Mark Felt), was worried that he would be exposed as a tipster in the Watergate scandal.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Toomey takes a chance on guns
How does a conservative Republican senator representing a state with a Democratic majority protect himself politically? One way is to take positions that tend to straddle the nation’s ideological fence.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Terrorists strive to create fear
The finish line of a road race serves as the division between one world and another. Ahead of the finish line, there is structure and discipline, with attention paid to the runners as they cross over. Spectators are kept back, mainly to avoid interfering with the participants — and perhaps to keep them from being trampled.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Kelly, allies battle arms treaty
Supporters of the right to bear arms have a champion in Congressman Mike Kelly. The federal lawmaker, whose district includes most of Lawrence County, has been making waves with his criticism of the Obama administration and its support for the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
-
Mitchel Olszak: I like beer, so I’m watching our state closely
I like beer. More to the point, I like good beer. In my younger days, just about any swill would do. But with the passage of time, sophistication and exposure to the possibilities, my interests in beer have sharpened and matured.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Political lessons from distant past hold value today
If you want to gain an appreciation for great thinkers, read some of history’s major political philosophies. Here you will find the works of Plato, Machiavelli, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, St. Augustine and many others. They explored difficult social issues and offered serious insight.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
-
