NEW CASTLE —
It’s a common Republican Party theme:
Government has too many regulations. The rules it establishes and hoops it sets up for businesses to jump through impede growth and progress in our society.
A smaller, leaner government that avoids restrictions and burdensome rules would benefit the nation.
It’s a credible argument — one that can be documented in assorted ways.
So why, when it comes to Pennsylvania’s new Voter ID law, has the Republican Party taken a completely different tack?
In personal stories and court proceedings, we are learning how difficult this new law makes voting for some people, even though they are obviously qualified to do so.
Backers of the law try to say its rules are simple and it’s easy for everyone to comply with. But that’s not so. Perhaps for the average person, who has a driver’s license or other common ID, the law is no big deal. But not everyone is so fortunate to escape the clutches of the Voter ID law so readily.
This is why the law is still rattling around in the Pennsylvania court system. Even Republicans on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused to give their stamp of approval.
Instead, in what seems to be a move that gives the Corbett administration one last chance to legitimize the measure, the justices sent it back to the lower court for additional review, complete with a tougher set of standards.
Yet amid all the legal and political jousting, it’s worth asking the question: Why are heavy-handed regulations imposed on potential voters OK when such rules imposed on businesses produce cries of GOP outrage?
The answer can be provided in one word: Hypocrisy.
When the state’s Voter ID law was approved by a Republican-dominated Legislature and administration, we were told it was necessary to prevent voter fraud. However, no documentation of such fraud was produced. And when the legislation wound up in court, the Corbett administration admitted from the start it could provide no evidence of fraud.
Instead, the law was presented as a preventive measure, to make sure fraud never occurs. The fact it made voting difficult for thousands of Pennsylvanians apparently was of no great concern.
And last week, on a radio talk show, state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, the main sponsor of the Voter ID legislation, dismissed complaints about the measure by saying, “... we have a lot of people out there that are too lazy to get up and get out there and get the ID they need.”
I wonder if he would say the same thing about businesses that chafe under state regulations.
What we see with the Voter ID law is one of the consequences of single-party rule. Ideally, the sausage grinder of the legislative process gives us a final product that’s been properly reviewed, tested and debated, with input from a variety of interests factored in.
But when one party — Democrat or Republican — is in complete control of government, a key goal is to find ways to shore up power and weaken the opposition. That was documented by House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, who told a GOP gathering earlier this year that the Voter ID law would assure a Mitt Romney victory in Pennsylvania.
However, there is a good chance the measure will not survive in the courts. And instead of giving Republicans additional advantage, the tactic provides Democrats with ammunition to use against the party in power.
In the end, Voter ID may come back to bite the GOP.
NEW CASTLE —
It’s a common Republican Party theme:
- Mitchel Olszak
Mitchel Olszak: Playing impeachment politics
This may be the first time in U.S. history that an administration has welcomed talk of impeachment.
Mitchel Olszak: IRS email fight clouds the issue
A scandal involving the Internal Revenue Service is now focused on missing emails. The absent data could represent the smoking gun Republicans have been seeking in their endless efforts to discredit the Obama administration.
Mitchel Olszak: Iraq is good argument for fracking
A friend of mine is a big advocate of shale gas drilling. It’s not because he owns land and is looking forward to royalties. He owns no property.
Mitchel Olszak: Government officials can’t dismiss Sunshine Law rights
There’s a fundamental problem I frequently see with government. It has to do with the people who hold positions of authority. Too often, they seem to overlook the real reason they are there.
Mitchel Olszak: Forced pooling and a clash of rights
There’s an old saying: The right of your fist ends where my nose begins. It’s a reference to the fact that in a free society, there are still boundaries that must be respected.
Mitchel Olszak: The consequence of cowardice
The anonymous letter came with a question. The writer claimed to be concerned about a decision made by a municipal governing body. Supposedly, this action was suspicious, devious and possibly illegal.
Mitchel Olszak: Jitters about the health effects of coffee remain unfounded
I drink plenty of coffee. The reasons are mainly two-fold. First, I like it. Second, it’s something of an occupational hazard. Traditionally, coffee and the news business go hand in hand.
Heartbleed raises the stakes on Internet security
My column last week dealt with Internet and related scams, along with steps people can take to protect themselves. Today’s column could be termed Part 2 of that topic, albeit from a different angle.
Mitchel Olszak: There’s no reason to be surprised by modern scams
P.T. Barnum once observed that there is a sucker born every minute. Judging from the people who complain about being caught up in computer scams, I think he was too conservative in his count.
Mitchel Olszak: Doubting the basic intelligence of ravens nevermore
Every now and then, I find myself watching the ravens around my house. That’s because their behavior is fascinating, and at times more than a little disturbing.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
- Mitchel Olszak: Playing impeachment politics