NEW CASTLE —
Who guards the guardians?
It’s a question that dates back at least to ancient Rome. It refers to the notion that someone ought to be keeping an eye on the folks who wield power in society.
To some extent, it’s the role of the press to guard the guardians (i.e., politicians) in our society. But to a larger degree, that task ultimately falls upon the citizens themselves.
I often tell people that the only thing newspapers really do is print words. It’s up to others to read those words and respond. The most significant news story in the world is useless if no one bothers to read or react to it.
In a democratic society, it’s essential that citizens serve as the guards of the guardians, demanding proper conduct. Otherwise, government can deteriorate into dictatorship.
Or it can unravel into an incompetent mess. Sort of what we have now.
In the field of journalism — along with certain nonprofit or public interest organizations — a new line of work has arisen related to politics. It’s called the fact checker.
It has become a mini industry, as statements by political candidates and campaign commercials are scrutinized for their content in terms of accuracy. Not surprisingly, fact checkers find fault with what politicians of all stripes are telling the American people.
It’s not that these politicians are lying — at least not blatantly so. Instead, they massage the truth, put their own spin on reality or leave out key details the public ought to know.
Considering all the charges and counter charges made in the current presidential campaign — particularly in terms of who’s giving the American people the straight story — you would think that fact checkers would be warmly welcomed by the voters looking for clarity and accuracy.
But surveys suggest that’s not the case. Information produced by fact checkers seems to have little impact on the electorate. And politicians are taking notice.
This is obvious when you look at the criticisms fact checkers make about assorted campaign ads. Often, these ads are dismantled by fact checkers, but the campaigns continue to run them. The declarations of fact checkers are dismissed as inconsequential.
Why? There are a couple of possibilities. One is that voters are every bit as partisan as the candidates. They don’t want nuance or insight. They merely want confirmation of their ideological views and they reject everything else.
Another is that with fact checkers serving to discredit both parties, no one’s left to believe in. When everybody’s blowing smoke in your face, how do you locate an honest candidate?
Unfortunately, this tainted political environment allows the distortions to persist. The politicians have no incentive to tell the truth if the voters are throwing up their hands in defeat.
So neither party will tell you hard, ugly decisions have to be made with the federal budget, mainly because you don’t want to hear that. Instead, voters will latch on to ideologically pleasing rhetoric that implies the nation’s fiscal problems can be resolved with a few relatively painless adjustments and perhaps a little pixie dust.
The real fact is that Republicans and Democrats both are letting this nation down. And the American people are allowing it to happen.
NEW CASTLE —
Who guards the guardians?
- Mitchel Olszak
Heartbleed raises the stakes on Internet security
My column last week dealt with Internet and related scams, along with steps people can take to protect themselves. Today’s column could be termed Part 2 of that topic, albeit from a different angle.
Mitchel Olszak: There’s no reason to be surprised by modern scams
P.T. Barnum once observed that there is a sucker born every minute. Judging from the people who complain about being caught up in computer scams, I think he was too conservative in his count.
Mitchel Olszak: Doubting the basic intelligence of ravens nevermore
Every now and then, I find myself watching the ravens around my house. That’s because their behavior is fascinating, and at times more than a little disturbing.
Mitchel Olszak: Taking a realistic look at Ukraine
Congressional Republicans have taken a tough stand against Russian President Vladimir Putin and his military moves against Ukraine.
Mitchel Olszak: Giving nutrition a new look
How many people look at the nutritional data placed on food packages? I mean really, really look at them, assess the numbers and act on the information.
Mitchel Olszak: Legislative inaction puts Pennsylvania marriage in the courts
In defending Pennsylvania over a lawsuit regarding gay marriage, commonwealth lawyers are falling back on what little they have. They note that last year’s Supreme Court decision involving the federal Defense of Marriage Act did not order states to require gay weddings.
Mitchel Olszak: America’s problem with equality
What does it mean to be equal in America? It’s a deceptively complex question, because we know people aren’t equal. Some are more intelligent than others.
Mitchel Olszak: Winter Olympics are a stone’s throw away
With the Winter Olympic Games about to begin in Sochi, Russia, there is considerable interest in the event. Not only is there buzzing over skiing and skating competitions, but controversy rages over security fears, the anti-gay attitudes of the Russian government and whether or not preparations for the games have been adequate.
Mitchel Olszak: While gathering data, did NSA miss details?
It is the nature of bureaucracies to seek expansion. The bigger, the better, you might say. A bureaucracy that’s growing and gaining resources is better positioned to protect itself and to ensure its future.
Mitchel Olszak: Public can make use of Pennsylvania’s open records procedures
When you’ve been in the news business for a while, you learn a few things about government and records. And one of them is that some people in government recognize the public’s right to know, and others do not.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
- Heartbleed raises the stakes on Internet security