NEW CASTLE —
I like beer.
More to the point, I like good beer.
In my younger days, just about any swill would do. But with the passage of time, sophistication and exposure to the possibilities, my interests in beer have sharpened and matured.
As a result, I don’t drink as much beer as I used to. But what I do drink, I consider quality. I appreciate the hoppiness of an imperial pale ale and the deep flavor of a dunkel.
Fortunately, I arrived at this point in my life when the nation was undergoing a microbrewing revolution of sorts. While major suppliers, such as Budweiser and Miller, continue to dominate the market, there are lots of alternatives around — if you’re prepared to look and pay a bit more.
It’s one of the benefits of a free market, where supply strives to meet demand.
Because my interests lie in the realm of malted beverages, rather than those that are distilled or involve the destruction of grape juice, my personal concerns over the fate of Pennsylvania’s state store system are limited.
While I philosophically oppose the idea of government being in the business of buying and selling consumer products, it’s frankly no skin off my nose. I have other priorities.
That said, I have, in my beer-drinking career, encountered some bizarre rules and restrictions imposed by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. Many of them seem to involve the politics of carving up the beer market for different business interests. Regardless, they represent the victory of bureaucracy over consumer demand.
With all of this in mind, I look at the efforts by Gov. Tom Corbett and others in Harrisburg to do away with the state store system and replace it with private wine and liquor businesses. It’s a controversial move in a commonwealth where political change tends to occur at a snail’s pace.
Some say it will be a boon for consumers, offering more choice and competition. Others say it will ultimately restrict choice, if the end result is a marketplace controlled by a few major retailers.
But my question is: What does all of this have to do with beer?
Quite a bit, perhaps. Beer distributors and others almost certainly will be impacted by changes in the law. More grocery stores and other retail markets will likely gain the ability to sell beer.
From a free market standpoint, that makes sense. But in its own strange way, will this backfire on consumers such as me?
In Pennsylvania, small beer manufacturers hold a greater share of the market than in the nation as a whole. Will box stores ignore microbreweries for the volume profits provided by the big boys? Will the end result of any liquor reform in Pennsylvania promote choice or stifle it?
It’s why a lot of us will be watching the Legislature closely.
NEW CASTLE —
I like beer.
- Mitchel Olszak
Heartbleed raises the stakes on Internet security
My column last week dealt with Internet and related scams, along with steps people can take to protect themselves. Today’s column could be termed Part 2 of that topic, albeit from a different angle.
Mitchel Olszak: There’s no reason to be surprised by modern scams
P.T. Barnum once observed that there is a sucker born every minute. Judging from the people who complain about being caught up in computer scams, I think he was too conservative in his count.
Mitchel Olszak: Doubting the basic intelligence of ravens nevermore
Every now and then, I find myself watching the ravens around my house. That’s because their behavior is fascinating, and at times more than a little disturbing.
Mitchel Olszak: Taking a realistic look at Ukraine
Congressional Republicans have taken a tough stand against Russian President Vladimir Putin and his military moves against Ukraine.
Mitchel Olszak: Giving nutrition a new look
How many people look at the nutritional data placed on food packages? I mean really, really look at them, assess the numbers and act on the information.
Mitchel Olszak: Legislative inaction puts Pennsylvania marriage in the courts
In defending Pennsylvania over a lawsuit regarding gay marriage, commonwealth lawyers are falling back on what little they have. They note that last year’s Supreme Court decision involving the federal Defense of Marriage Act did not order states to require gay weddings.
Mitchel Olszak: America’s problem with equality
What does it mean to be equal in America? It’s a deceptively complex question, because we know people aren’t equal. Some are more intelligent than others.
Mitchel Olszak: Winter Olympics are a stone’s throw away
With the Winter Olympic Games about to begin in Sochi, Russia, there is considerable interest in the event. Not only is there buzzing over skiing and skating competitions, but controversy rages over security fears, the anti-gay attitudes of the Russian government and whether or not preparations for the games have been adequate.
Mitchel Olszak: While gathering data, did NSA miss details?
It is the nature of bureaucracies to seek expansion. The bigger, the better, you might say. A bureaucracy that’s growing and gaining resources is better positioned to protect itself and to ensure its future.
Mitchel Olszak: Public can make use of Pennsylvania’s open records procedures
When you’ve been in the news business for a while, you learn a few things about government and records. And one of them is that some people in government recognize the public’s right to know, and others do not.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
- Heartbleed raises the stakes on Internet security