NEW CASTLE —
What does it mean to be equal in America?
It’s a deceptively complex question, because we know people aren’t equal. Some are more intelligent than others. Some are physically stronger than others. Some have greater artistic or musical talents than others.
Human beings differ in countless ways in terms of assets and abilities.
Yet a fundamental document linked to America’s founding — the Declaration of Independence — holds that “all men are created equal.” So what gives?
The answer involves something best described as essential equality. We, as human beings, are equal in the sense that we are each distinct individuals. And under the rule of law we have crafted in this country, we are recognized as possessing the same rights and liberties as the guy next to us.
It seems a simple enough concept, but talk of equality gives a lot of Americans the willies.
Take the ongoing dispute over gay marriage. Courts are increasingly rejecting state and federal laws that fail to recognize the rights of gays to marry, mainly on the grounds such laws fail to extend equal rights.
When the United States Constitution guarantees equal protection under the law, denying individuals fundamental rights because of sexual orientation poses a serious problem.
Meanwhile, President Obama lately has been talking about economic inequality in America, warning it is an issue that must be addressed.
The case can indeed be made that societies with extremes between rich and poor are inherently unstable and ripe for revolution and collapse. But does America come close to fitting that description?
And is it the role of government to do something about it? It’s one thing for government to protect the essential equality of individuals; it’s another thing to develop policies designed to level the economic playing field.
One reason for that is a genuine disagreement over whether government policies along those lines help or hurt. In some eyes, government social programs lend crucial aid to those in need. To others, they are traps that create a culture of dependency on government services.
In a free society, there is room to have serious and sincere debates on such issues and the notion of how to deal with economic inequality. On the other hand, you have Tom Perkins.
Perkins is a billionaire venture capitalist who claims he is concerned American tax and fiscal policies will lead to the “extinction” of wealthy people. There is, by the way, absolutely no evidence this is even remotely occurring.
Speaking recently in San Francisco, Perkins told his audience that voting ought to be based on the paying of taxes. He suggested people should receive one vote for every dollar in taxes they pay.
It’s an elitist notion based on the idea that tax payments somehow translate into wisdom. In reality, there are plenty of rich people who expend considerable time and resources practicing the art of tax avoidance. The federal tax code — crafted mainly to benefit the wealthy — assists mightily in that effort. I can assure you the wealthy in America are not suffering.
But we can at least be grateful to Perkins for demonstrating that having money isn’t the same has having common sense.
NEW CASTLE —
What does it mean to be equal in America?
- Mitchel Olszak
Mitchel Olszak: Taking a realistic look at Ukraine
Congressional Republicans have taken a tough stand against Russian President Vladimir Putin and his military moves against Ukraine.
Mitchel Olszak: Giving nutrition a new look
How many people look at the nutritional data placed on food packages? I mean really, really look at them, assess the numbers and act on the information.
Mitchel Olszak: Legislative inaction puts Pennsylvania marriage in the courts
In defending Pennsylvania over a lawsuit regarding gay marriage, commonwealth lawyers are falling back on what little they have. They note that last year’s Supreme Court decision involving the federal Defense of Marriage Act did not order states to require gay weddings.
Mitchel Olszak: America’s problem with equality
What does it mean to be equal in America? It’s a deceptively complex question, because we know people aren’t equal. Some are more intelligent than others.
Mitchel Olszak: Winter Olympics are a stone’s throw away
With the Winter Olympic Games about to begin in Sochi, Russia, there is considerable interest in the event. Not only is there buzzing over skiing and skating competitions, but controversy rages over security fears, the anti-gay attitudes of the Russian government and whether or not preparations for the games have been adequate.
Mitchel Olszak: While gathering data, did NSA miss details?
It is the nature of bureaucracies to seek expansion. The bigger, the better, you might say. A bureaucracy that’s growing and gaining resources is better positioned to protect itself and to ensure its future.
Mitchel Olszak: Public can make use of Pennsylvania’s open records procedures
When you’ve been in the news business for a while, you learn a few things about government and records. And one of them is that some people in government recognize the public’s right to know, and others do not.
Mitchel Olszak: Christie must bridge gap in his image
As every political junkie knows, it’s never too early to handicap the next presidential election. And so it is that pundits of all sorts are now assessing the impact a bridge scandal will have on the prospective candidacy of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
Mitch Olszak: More than good intentions needed to start a business
“If you build it, he will come.” That’s a famous line from the movie “Field of Dreams.” For those who haven’t seen the film, a disembodied voice whispers these words to the main character, played by Kevin Costner.
Mitchel Olszak: ‘Duck Dynasty’ star dodges flak
I must admit that I do not watch the television program “Duck Dynasty.” In fact, I don’t watch any so-called “reality” TV shows. I have my own reality, thank you very much. From what I can tell, these programs are about as real as professional wrestling.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
- Mitchel Olszak: Taking a realistic look at Ukraine