NEW CASTLE —
Do you think it’s OK to shoot a unicorn?
Should hunters be allowed to bag dragons? And what’s the creel limit on Loch Ness monsters?
These questions might seem silly, but there are people who take them seriously.
And that may include certain wildlife officials in that state of New York — at least when it comes to matters related to Bigfoot.
I received an email the other day from someone named Peter Wiemer, who identifies himself as the director of the Chautauqua Lake Bigfoot Expo. Wiemer is apparently concerned that someone may shoot a Bigfoot in New York, perhaps even in his home base of Chautauqua County.
Wiemer’s worries seem to stem from a $10 million bounty recently offered by SpikeTV for proof of Bigfoot’s existence. Obviously, the only real way to document a Bigfoot is to produce one, dead or alive.
So SpikeTV’s bounty prompted Wiemer to write to wildlife officials in his home state, asking for an explanation of Bigfoot’s status in terms of protection.
Earlier this year, Wiemer received a letter from Mark Kandel, a regional wildlife manager with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation.
Kandel noted in his letter that New York has no official record of Bigfoots (or is it Bigfeet?) in the state and therefore regulations do not directly address the animal.
However, Kandel added: “Because it is not addressed there is no open season on Bigfoot and they may not be taken. We are confident that the current laws and regulations afford adequate protect for Bigfoot if one were to be found in N.Y.
“Under the current laws and regulations you and others are free to pursue Bigfoot for the purpose of documenting their existence provided none are harmed and you abide by the laws and regulations pertaining to trespass on private property and use of public lands.”
But this statement did not satisfy Wiemer, who persisted with his efforts. He should have quit while he was ahead.
A second letter, this one from Gordon R. Batcheller, the state’s chief wildlife biologist, was decidedly less supportive. Batcheller flat-out dismissed Bigfoot as a “mythical” animal that “does not exist in nature or otherwise.”
And as far as protective laws or regulations go, Batcheller added that “no program or action in relation to mythical animals is warranted.”
So I guess it’s open season on Bigfoot in New York. To the best of my knowledge, the same holds true in Pennsylvania.
As you might surmise by now, I count myself among the skeptics where Bigfoot is concerned, to put it mildly. While there’s a certain romance to the notion of such mysterious and elusive creatures actually living among us, I don’t believe it. Then again, my background as a journalist means that skepticism is part of my basic nature.
On the other hand, discussion as to whether or not state hunting laws should apply to, or reference, non-existent animals raises some interesting philosophical questions. For instance, should the law be silent on such matters, or should it clearly state that government cannot regulate the hunting of creatures that don’t exist?
Then again, maybe there should be a ban on hunting Bigfoot, not to protect the animal, but to protect the rest of us. You have to wonder about the mind set of someone who’s going about trying to shoot a mythical creature. Perhaps this person shouldn’t have a gun.
NEW CASTLE —
Do you think it’s OK to shoot a unicorn?
- Mitchel Olszak
Mitchel Olszak: Snooping threat to the free press
In “All the President’s Men,” reporter Bob Woodward conducts late-night meetings with a source in a parking garage. That source, Deep Throat (later revealed to be high-ranking FBI official Mark Felt), was worried that he would be exposed as a tipster in the Watergate scandal.
Mitchel Olszak: Toomey takes a chance on guns
How does a conservative Republican senator representing a state with a Democratic majority protect himself politically? One way is to take positions that tend to straddle the nation’s ideological fence.
Mitchel Olszak: Terrorists strive to create fear
The finish line of a road race serves as the division between one world and another. Ahead of the finish line, there is structure and discipline, with attention paid to the runners as they cross over. Spectators are kept back, mainly to avoid interfering with the participants — and perhaps to keep them from being trampled.
Mitchel Olszak: Kelly, allies battle arms treaty
Supporters of the right to bear arms have a champion in Congressman Mike Kelly. The federal lawmaker, whose district includes most of Lawrence County, has been making waves with his criticism of the Obama administration and its support for the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
Mitchel Olszak: I like beer, so I’m watching our state closely
I like beer. More to the point, I like good beer. In my younger days, just about any swill would do. But with the passage of time, sophistication and exposure to the possibilities, my interests in beer have sharpened and matured.
Mitchel Olszak: Political lessons from distant past hold value today
If you want to gain an appreciation for great thinkers, read some of history’s major political philosophies. Here you will find the works of Plato, Machiavelli, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, St. Augustine and many others. They explored difficult social issues and offered serious insight.
Mitchel Olszak: Do the emotional centers of the brain guide our politics?
People who hold specific political points of view like to think their positions are based on serious analysis. They view their given ideologies as careful conclusions reached through assessing the world around them and examining how things work. Thus, liberals and conservatives both manage to claim the intellectual and ethical high ground.
Mitchel Olszak: Will GOP survive current divisions?
Somebody asked me the other day if I thought the Republican Party was about to split apart. I said no. It was an assessment based on history. Creating a new political party in America is a challenging process. They occasionally crop up, but they don’t last.
Mitchel Olszak: History as a matter of chance
History is full of pivotal moments. What if Socrates had decided against drinking that hemlock? What if Gutenberg hadn’t developed his printing press? What if Washington’s army failed to survive the winter at Valley Forge? What if Edison gave up on inventing the light bulb?
Mitchel Olszak: Pennsylvanians shouldn’t be fooled by electoral hijinks
Back in the 2000 presidential election, Americans received a civics lesson of sorts. Much of it involved obscure terms such as hanging and dimpled chads, as well as butterfly ballots. All of this, of course, came courtesy of Florida, whose clumsy election efforts produced an extended period of uncertainty in the presidential contest between George W. Bush and Al Gore.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
- Mitchel Olszak: Snooping threat to the free press