NEW CASTLE —
Moshe Kai Cavalin doesn’t view himself as a genius.
But you decide. He’s 14 years old, has two college degrees and is finishing up his third.
I came across Moshe’s story courtesy of an Associated Press report last week out of Los Angeles. The article told how he originally entered East Los Angeles Community College at age 8 and received two associate in arts degrees a year later.
This year, he will receive a bachelor’s degree in math from UCLA. And, as an aside, his first book “We Can Do,” was just published in English. This was after he wrote it originally in Chinese.
Moshe now has his sights set on earning a doctorate.
The theme of his book involves the need to apply oneself in order to succeed. Moshe argues his accomplishments are not the result of genius, but rather his drive to achieve.
And it’s not that he has focused solely on his studies. Moshe’s book covers his interests in soccer and martial arts, as well as scuba diving. So it sounds as if he’s a physically active youngster, not sealed in a room somewhere with a stack of books and a computer.
So can a 14-year-old acquire three college degrees without being a genius? The AP story did not mention Moshe’s IQ, but I suspect it’s much higher than average. There’s a difference between being more successful than most and blowing the competition away.
Still, Moshe makes a valid point about the benefits of perseverance and determination. Even though this message comes from a child, it offers a lesson for all.
Simple math and the basic laws of physics tell us that the more time we spend working to achieve our goals, the more likely we are to enjoy success. There are only 24 hours in a day, and those who spend most of their awake hours watching television, playing video games or pursuing other forms of entertainment will have difficulty keeping up with people who apply themselves to the task at hand.
Obviously, this is a concept that can be directed toward children and their classroom studies. But it’s good guidance for adults as well. We all have to decide how much of our time we want to spend playing and how much we want to spend working.
We also have to determine how much of an effort we want to make in terms of bettering ourselves. And we all come to different conclusions. Some of us seek to hone our skills. Some go back to school for additional training. And some go fishing.
But the decisions we make have consequences — for better or worse.
If we are comfortable with our efforts in life, and satisfied with the results, that’s great. But if we fail to apply ourselves properly and then discover that we are falling behind and missing opportunities, who’s fault is that?
We don’t have to match Moshe’s achievements at a young age in order to be a success. That’s a subjective term and can be determined in a variety of ways.
Becoming a success, however, inevitably takes effort. And ultimately, that effort must come from us.
Mitchel Olszak
Related Photos
-
Mitchel Olszak, Dear Reader
Discussion
Mitchel Olszak: A 14-year-old’s prescription for success
- Mitchel Olszak
-
-
Mitchel Olszak: Toomey takes a chance on guns
How does a conservative Republican senator representing a state with a Democratic majority protect himself politically? One way is to take positions that tend to straddle the nation’s ideological fence.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Terrorists strive to create fear
The finish line of a road race serves as the division between one world and another. Ahead of the finish line, there is structure and discipline, with attention paid to the runners as they cross over. Spectators are kept back, mainly to avoid interfering with the participants — and perhaps to keep them from being trampled.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Kelly, allies battle arms treaty
Supporters of the right to bear arms have a champion in Congressman Mike Kelly. The federal lawmaker, whose district includes most of Lawrence County, has been making waves with his criticism of the Obama administration and its support for the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
-
Mitchel Olszak: I like beer, so I’m watching our state closely
I like beer. More to the point, I like good beer. In my younger days, just about any swill would do. But with the passage of time, sophistication and exposure to the possibilities, my interests in beer have sharpened and matured.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Political lessons from distant past hold value today
If you want to gain an appreciation for great thinkers, read some of history’s major political philosophies. Here you will find the works of Plato, Machiavelli, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, St. Augustine and many others. They explored difficult social issues and offered serious insight.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Do the emotional centers of the brain guide our politics?
People who hold specific political points of view like to think their positions are based on serious analysis. They view their given ideologies as careful conclusions reached through assessing the world around them and examining how things work. Thus, liberals and conservatives both manage to claim the intellectual and ethical high ground.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Will GOP survive current divisions?
Somebody asked me the other day if I thought the Republican Party was about to split apart. I said no. It was an assessment based on history. Creating a new political party in America is a challenging process. They occasionally crop up, but they don’t last.
-
Mitchel Olszak: History as a matter of chance
History is full of pivotal moments. What if Socrates had decided against drinking that hemlock? What if Gutenberg hadn’t developed his printing press? What if Washington’s army failed to survive the winter at Valley Forge? What if Edison gave up on inventing the light bulb?
-
Mitchel Olszak: Pennsylvanians shouldn’t be fooled by electoral hijinks
Back in the 2000 presidential election, Americans received a civics lesson of sorts. Much of it involved obscure terms such as hanging and dimpled chads, as well as butterfly ballots. All of this, of course, came courtesy of Florida, whose clumsy election efforts produced an extended period of uncertainty in the presidential contest between George W. Bush and Al Gore.
-
Mitchel Olszak: CBS practices censorship to protect its interests
When it comes to integrity in the field of broadcasting, few can challenge the standing of CBS. Since the days of radio, this organization has stood out in its commitment to tough-minded, serious journalism. From Edward R. Murrow to Walter Cronkite to the current crop of reporters on “60 Minutes,” CBS has built a reputation no entity can match.
- More Mitchel Olszak Headlines
-
