Some things just never go away.
One of them is the idea to impose term limits on members of Congress.
Once a big deal in the 1990s, discussion about imposing term limits has died down to a whisper in recent years. But the idea is apparently not dead.
In fact, just this week an Arizona congressman introduced an amendment to the Constitution limiting terms for House members to three and senators to two. That would mean six years for House members and 12 years for senators.
Now, members of Congress can serve as long as their constituents keep electing them. Joseph Lieberman was elected four times to the U.S. Senate from Connecticut and retired last year. After opposing term limits while in the Senate, he now endorses them.
Strange, isn’t it?
Anyway, have you ever really thought about why people want to impose term limits on members of Congress but tend to ignore everyone else from township auditor up mayor or county commissioner?
There have been exceptions in some states where limits have been placed on state legislators. Plus, Pennsylvania has term limits for statewide offices, including governor, attorney general, auditor general and treasurer.
However, for the most part, the emphasis has been on Washington rather than local government for limiting how long elected officials can serve.
The argument for limiting term of House members and senators is that after a certain point they lose touch with their constituents. Nobody has yet determined when they arrive at this point. Could it be four years, six years, 10 or 20?
So, if they do lose touch with the folks back home, why is that? It can’t be because they aren’t back home in their districts enough. The House, for example, is scheduled to be in session 126 days this year, thus giving them the rest of the year at home.
Could it be that they lose touch when they receive huge campaign contributions from various political action committees and are heavily lobbied by those organizations?
The answer, of course, is yes. As a result, they end up paying more attention to the lobbyists than they do to the constituents who put them in office in the first place.
Candidates for local offices receive campaign contributions, but nothing resembling those received by federal lawmakers. And, they don’t have lobbyists sitting outside their offices on a daily basis.
Furthermore, there have been mayors throughout the country who have served multiple terms and did not fall out of favor with the voters.
The people who get elected to Congress are no different from those who win election locally. But the one thing that distinguishes the two is campaign funding. Limiting terms may make some people feel good, but it will do little to change the culture in Washington as long as the money continues to flow.
Some things just never go away.
- John K. Manna
John K. Manna: State says some local people have high incomes
A lot of people fantasize about becoming instant millionaires. That’s why millions of Americans play the lottery, particularly when the jackpots for Powerball and Mega Millions exceed $100 million.
John K. Manna: Son of football legend leads political field in poll
Jay Paterno announced last week that he will be a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor in the May primary. Earlier this week, a poll showed Paterno leading the field of Democratic candidates for lieutenant governor by a slim margin.
John K. Manna: Distressed status gives city more revenue sources
New Castle’s population decline over the years has been well documented. It may be small consolation, but most cities in the Northeast have experienced a migration of residents to the suburbs or the Sun Belt over the last 50 years or so.
John K. Manna: Governor’s stances appear to shift over time
Where did Gov. Tom Corbett get his ideas? I don’t know if anyone has ever asked that question, but it came to me this week after reading a column written by G. Terry Madonna and Michael L. Young.
John K. Manna: Survey data suggest governor faces re-election struggle
While public opinion polls are conducted throughout the year, this is the time of year they may carry more significance. Primarily because we are entering a new political campaign season, one in which Pennsylvania voters will be electing a governor.
John K. Manna: Rationale for rejected Voter ID law remains suspicous
Back in 2011, state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe said House Bill 934 was needed “to ensure our system has integrity.” Metcalfe, a Butler County Republican, was the prime sponsor of the bill requiring voters to provide a state-approved photo identification when voting.
John K. Manna: State acts to give public more information
When someone suggests, for example, that school property taxes be replaced with state funding, school officials object. And why? They contend that local control would be diminished as a result. I find it laughable since school districts really have little local control now.
John K. Manna: Council members clash on filling empty slot
What a way to begin a new session of New Castle City Council. If this is a honeymoon, I can’t imagine what the divorce may look like. Not that I’m predicting any kind of irreconcilable differences among members of council, but they got off to a rocky start Thursday night in attempting to fill a vacancy on council.
John K. Manna: City school board contest saw plenty of campaign spending
This has been an unusual year for politics in Lawrence County. It’s been a highly uneventful year, except perhaps for those who won election to public office.
John K. Manna: Party labels shouldn’t matter in local contests
Anything is possible in elections, but often improbable when it comes to school board races in Pennsylvania. In the Nov. 5 election, voters went to the polls in six of the eight school districts in Lawrence County and were faced with little choice.
- More John K. Manna Headlines
- John K. Manna: State says some local people have high incomes