NEW CASTLE —
This is my take on federal taxes.
Too much is made of them by the president and members of Congress. That includes past presidents and past members of Congress.
The current debate, which has been ongoing since President Obama took office, is whether the Bush-era tax cuts should be allowed to expire or continue after this year. Republicans want them to continue while Obama wants to continue them for all but the top 2 percent of income tax filers.
The Economic Policy Institute, which says it’s an independent, nonprofit think tank that researches the impact of economic trends and policies on working people, has issued an analysis of how the Bush-era tax cuts have benefited the wealthiest people and lowered their effective tax rates.
That’s because the top 1 percent realize most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which are taxed at a lower rate than wages and salaries, according to EPI.
The bottom 80 percent, on the other hand, receive most of their income from wages and salaries.
Plus, the income derived from capital gains and dividends has increased for the wealthiest between 1996 and 2006 while income from wages and salaries for the bottom 80 percent has remained essentially the same during that period.
Democrats and Republicans can argue over Obama’s justification for wanting the tax cuts to expire for the wealthiest. Politically speaking, Obama is on the winning side simply because 80 percent obviously trumps 1 or 2 percent when it comes to the November election.
Which brings me to my original point. I submit that most voters don’t base their vote for president or members of Congress on tax rates or which group of taxpayers is given favoritism. Sure, people get riled up from time to time about taxes, but taxes aren’t the determining factor in elections.
Nonetheless, Republicans and Democrats constantly go back forth over this issue. The way to resolve it is to flatten the tax so that everyone would pay the same rate or close to the same rate on all income.
Democrats don’t like the idea because they say it favors the wealthy. It’s an argument I don’t comprehend since everyone would be paying the same rate. Isn’t that fair?
Many Republicans have advocated a flat tax, but don’t push for it. Even though they control the House.
Both sides would rather have a war of words, trying to win political points, when in the end they don’t.
If they did come to terms on taxes, it would leave a big void in political campaigns. Candidates would have to find something else to talk about. That would be very difficult for some of them.
NEW CASTLE —
This is my take on federal taxes.
- John K. Manna
John K. Manna: Party labels shouldn’t matter in local contests
Anything is possible in elections, but often improbable when it comes to school board races in Pennsylvania. In the Nov. 5 election, voters went to the polls in six of the eight school districts in Lawrence County and were faced with little choice.
John K. Manna: State finally has road, bridge repair plan
Pennsylvania finally has a program in place to fix roads and bridges and provide more money for mass transit. The massive undertaking — pushed by Republican Gov. Tom Corbett — will cost about $2.3 million per year, most of which will be paid by motorists in the form of increases in gas prices at the pump and fees.
John K. Manna: Three former governors give their endorsements
Another election is history, which means another election campaign season is under way. Actually, some Democratic candidates running in next year’s gubernatorial contest couldn’t wait and began campaigning months before this year’s election.
John K. Manna: Taking a look at Tuesday’s election results
What to take away from Tuesday’s election in Lawrence County. Maybe not much, but let’s try. Voter turnout was awful — just below 20 percent. Based on records of the county Board of Elections, it was the worst turnout for a general election within the last 30 years.
John K. Manna: Voters must make choices in ‘off-year’ contests
I don’t know who coined the phrase “off-year election.” The implication is that it’s not as important as presidential, gubernatorial and congressional elections.
John K. Manna: Why would anyone run for office?
Why are you running for office? This is often the first question — a softball one at that — candidates for public office are asked. And sometimes we get great answers and sometimes we’ll get something like, “Hmm, let me think.”
John K. Manna: Doing away with school property taxes would cause new problems
In less than a month, a bill in the Pennsylvania House went from committee to adoption. I’m certain it’s no record, but considering the significance of the legislation, the House wasted little time. But this is one bill that House members should have taken longer to consider and even defeat in its current form.
John K. Manna: Despite significance of races, history suggests a low turnout this fall
The deadline to register to vote in the November election is just nine days away. It’s highly doubtful we’ll see hordes of unregistered people rushing to the courthouse to get their names on the registration rolls generally because odd-numbered year elections simply don’t generate as much interest as those in the even-numbered years.
John K. Manna: State should foot the bill for education
OK, here’s my periodic look at property tax reform in Pennsylvania, or the lack thereof. Rep. Seth Grove of York County offered the latest proposal to deal with school property taxes. He calls it the Optional Property Tax Elimination Act.
John K. Manna: Voters are always hoping for something better
Ed Rendell a candidate for Philadelphia mayor? His name is being tossed around as possibly running again for mayor, a post he held before he ran for governor.
- More John K. Manna Headlines
- John K. Manna: Party labels shouldn’t matter in local contests