NEW CASTLE —
This is my take on federal taxes.
Too much is made of them by the president and members of Congress. That includes past presidents and past members of Congress.
The current debate, which has been ongoing since President Obama took office, is whether the Bush-era tax cuts should be allowed to expire or continue after this year. Republicans want them to continue while Obama wants to continue them for all but the top 2 percent of income tax filers.
The Economic Policy Institute, which says it’s an independent, nonprofit think tank that researches the impact of economic trends and policies on working people, has issued an analysis of how the Bush-era tax cuts have benefited the wealthiest people and lowered their effective tax rates.
That’s because the top 1 percent realize most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which are taxed at a lower rate than wages and salaries, according to EPI.
The bottom 80 percent, on the other hand, receive most of their income from wages and salaries.
Plus, the income derived from capital gains and dividends has increased for the wealthiest between 1996 and 2006 while income from wages and salaries for the bottom 80 percent has remained essentially the same during that period.
Democrats and Republicans can argue over Obama’s justification for wanting the tax cuts to expire for the wealthiest. Politically speaking, Obama is on the winning side simply because 80 percent obviously trumps 1 or 2 percent when it comes to the November election.
Which brings me to my original point. I submit that most voters don’t base their vote for president or members of Congress on tax rates or which group of taxpayers is given favoritism. Sure, people get riled up from time to time about taxes, but taxes aren’t the determining factor in elections.
Nonetheless, Republicans and Democrats constantly go back forth over this issue. The way to resolve it is to flatten the tax so that everyone would pay the same rate or close to the same rate on all income.
Democrats don’t like the idea because they say it favors the wealthy. It’s an argument I don’t comprehend since everyone would be paying the same rate. Isn’t that fair?
Many Republicans have advocated a flat tax, but don’t push for it. Even though they control the House.
Both sides would rather have a war of words, trying to win political points, when in the end they don’t.
If they did come to terms on taxes, it would leave a big void in political campaigns. Candidates would have to find something else to talk about. That would be very difficult for some of them.
NEW CASTLE —
This is my take on federal taxes.
- John K. Manna
John K. Manna: State says some local people have high incomes
A lot of people fantasize about becoming instant millionaires. That’s why millions of Americans play the lottery, particularly when the jackpots for Powerball and Mega Millions exceed $100 million.
John K. Manna: Son of football legend leads political field in poll
Jay Paterno announced last week that he will be a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor in the May primary. Earlier this week, a poll showed Paterno leading the field of Democratic candidates for lieutenant governor by a slim margin.
John K. Manna: Distressed status gives city more revenue sources
New Castle’s population decline over the years has been well documented. It may be small consolation, but most cities in the Northeast have experienced a migration of residents to the suburbs or the Sun Belt over the last 50 years or so.
John K. Manna: Governor’s stances appear to shift over time
Where did Gov. Tom Corbett get his ideas? I don’t know if anyone has ever asked that question, but it came to me this week after reading a column written by G. Terry Madonna and Michael L. Young.
John K. Manna: Survey data suggest governor faces re-election struggle
While public opinion polls are conducted throughout the year, this is the time of year they may carry more significance. Primarily because we are entering a new political campaign season, one in which Pennsylvania voters will be electing a governor.
John K. Manna: Rationale for rejected Voter ID law remains suspicous
Back in 2011, state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe said House Bill 934 was needed “to ensure our system has integrity.” Metcalfe, a Butler County Republican, was the prime sponsor of the bill requiring voters to provide a state-approved photo identification when voting.
John K. Manna: State acts to give public more information
When someone suggests, for example, that school property taxes be replaced with state funding, school officials object. And why? They contend that local control would be diminished as a result. I find it laughable since school districts really have little local control now.
John K. Manna: Council members clash on filling empty slot
What a way to begin a new session of New Castle City Council. If this is a honeymoon, I can’t imagine what the divorce may look like. Not that I’m predicting any kind of irreconcilable differences among members of council, but they got off to a rocky start Thursday night in attempting to fill a vacancy on council.
John K. Manna: City school board contest saw plenty of campaign spending
This has been an unusual year for politics in Lawrence County. It’s been a highly uneventful year, except perhaps for those who won election to public office.
John K. Manna: Party labels shouldn’t matter in local contests
Anything is possible in elections, but often improbable when it comes to school board races in Pennsylvania. In the Nov. 5 election, voters went to the polls in six of the eight school districts in Lawrence County and were faced with little choice.
- More John K. Manna Headlines
- John K. Manna: State says some local people have high incomes