NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
If President Obama was truly concerned about the Syrian people, then he wouldn’t be inserting America into the middle of a civil and regional war, the impact of which will only serve to create further chaos and suffering.
Americans are skeptical about U.S. military intervention in Syria and rightfully so. There is, after all, no available evidence as to who is responsible for the heinous use of chemical gas in Syria. In addition, Syria clearly poses no national security threat to the U.S. And now, on top of the $1 trillion spent in Iraq and Afghanistan, the president wants to launch million-dollar Tomahawk cruise missiles on Syria.
For what purpose? Do you think such actions will solve the problems and end the conflict? And what happens after the 90-day timeline has been reached?
Moreover, who benefits from this proposed action? The president, I guess, as he saves face over his ill-advised red line comment. The arms merchants, for sure. And the various countries in and out of the region that are using Syria as a battleground for their grievances against Iran.
And lest we forget, what about al-Qaida and its ilk? Wouldn’t they benefit and be strengthened by weakening the Syrian government? Talk about unintended consequences.
No, we can’t win over there and that really shouldn’t be our role. We can’t, after all, be the world’s policeman.
The only way out is to find a political solution. And that begins with negotiations and diplomacy, something we seem to have abandoned in favor of bombs and bullets.
Perhaps, if enough of us contact our Congress members, we could make a difference and avoid a disaster waiting to happen in Syria.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
National Anthem play was insult to listener
Editor, The News: We had a wonderful time at Pearson Park listening to a DJ play patriotic music through the evening on July 4.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form