New Castle News

Letters to the Editor

November 11, 2013

Pro-life criticism fails to withstand scrutiny

NEW CASTLE — Editor, The News:

I respectfully beg to differ with Patricia Peiffer on her views regarding “pro-life folks.”

Her letter to the editor appeared on Oct. 19.

She cites the Alpha-Omega Center touting its 85 percent rate of women who decide against abortion as probably attributable to scare tactics. I would cite a more plausible reason. Women who are considering an abortion are presented with the truth, i.e., they have a child growing inside them.

She questions where are the “pro-lifers” once a child is born. My response to this is we are there. We offer help and support in the form of donations to organizations such as Good Counsel Homes. This organization provides unconditional help and support to pregnant women. It can be researched on the Internet at

She cites an incident where a boyfriend threw a 2-month-old infant against a wall causing horrible injuries and questions if the infant might have been better off aborted. My response to this thought: are we to kill a child just because of what could happen? Absolutely not.

She says it is time for us to assemble again, and it is easy to meet for a rally, to carry pro-life signs and light candles. I would submit to her that I have never found these activities “easy.” but I do find them necessary.

I would further suggest that our life-affirming action and duty, not only as pro-life persons, but most important, as human beings, is the exposure of the truth; that abortion is the killing of a child and evil such as this must be revealed.

Tom J. Navarra

Oak Tree Drive

New Castle

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Letters to the Editor
  • Letter to the Editor E-form

    Send Letter to the Editor      E-form

    April 23, 2010

  • Patriotic attire rule offends veteran

    Editor, The News: On July 2, as I was checking out of our local Wal-Mart, something happened that disturbed me. A cashier went to the cashier in my lane and said orders had come down from the store manager that no one was allowed to wear any patriotic shirts, pins, symbols or anything showing patriotic colors from July 4 to July 11.

    August 1, 2014

  • Do views on baptism match Bible’s words?

    Editor, The News: In regard to the Rev. Randy Crum. He must be reading a different Bible than the Christian religion. What theologian taught him his version?

    July 31, 2014

  • Aging agency offers help with Medicare

    Editor, The News: I am writing in response to the woman who reported problems she was encountering with the high out-of-pocket costs of her Medicare supplemental insurance plan in last Saturday’s “The People Speak.”

    July 30, 2014

  • ‘State Fair’ displays Playhouse possibilities

    Editor, The News: I had a delightful experience attending the New Castle Playhouse opening night performance of “State Fair.”

    July 29, 2014

  • Dreaming of being local meteorologist

    Editor, The News: I always wanted to be a meteorologist. I am never wrong or right and I still have a job. I provide data that no one understands while I am warm and dry waving my arms with that important suit and smug smile.

    July 28, 2014

  • People should check health insurance

    Editor, The News: I have paid the local hospital almost $1,500 in co-payments because my supplemental insurance was turned into a health maintenance organization, which was allowed to override my Medicare coverage.

    July 26, 2014

  • In Bible, Jesus calls for people to repent

    Editor, The News: Recently in the paper, Elton John said he believes Jesus would support same-sex marriages.

    July 26, 2014

  • Scientific knowledge may be something else

    Editor, The News: Science is knowledge derived by method; things scientific meet the criteria of science, but neither the criteria, nor the method are scientific.

    July 25, 2014

  • Dog park supporters made big difference

    Editor, The News: I just want to acknowledge News reporter David Burcham for his coverage on Jasmine’s park

    July 24, 2014

House Ads

On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted to authorize Speaker John Boehner to sue President Obama for allegedly overstepping his legal authority with the way he's handled Obamacare. Good call?

Yes. Obama's been overstepping his authority since day one in office. It's time he pay the piper.
No. The allegations are ridiculous and the law suit is a waste of time and tax payer money.
I don't know. I'm not a huge fan of Obama, but the suit seems a little extreme.
     View Results