NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
Sen. Elder Vogel’s recent vote to suppress voter turnout by supporting the new Pennsylvania photo ID law is mind-numbing.
I contend that voting fraud in Pennsylvania is not a problem, and that laws are already in existence to deal with any fraudulent voting.
The problem with voting that bothers Vogel and other state Republicans is probably the results of the last federal elections, which saw the Democratic candidates carrying the commonwealth.
I recently spoke with a representative of Vogel, in order to better understand the senator’s vote. The representative informed me that, up until the passage of this legislation, it has been impossible to know how widespread voting fraud has become.
This bill, in effect, would prevent fraud even though no widespread fraud is certain.
But this same official added that voting by absentee ballot would require no photo identification. This is a loophole Vogel could drive his tractor through.
Vogel’s representative went on to say that 99 percent of all registered voters in Pennsylvania possess a photo ID. I don’t know that such is the case, but I do know that more voters possess fingerprints and distinctive irises, so why not document those body parts?
It would save the time and expense of a trip to the PennDOT office to be fingerprinted prior to voting. After all, if Vogel is so concerned with all the possible fraud that may, or may not have, permeated each and every election in Pennsylvania, then treating each voter in the 47th Senatorial District as a possible criminal, should give some comfort to the Senator.
This is a tax. The new photo ID law taxes the ability of a large number of citizens to participate in what’s left of our democracy.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
National Anthem play was insult to listener
Editor, The News: We had a wonderful time at Pearson Park listening to a DJ play patriotic music through the evening on July 4.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form