NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
Answering Bonnie Humphrey’s challenge in a recent letter:
1. The undergirding ground of any argument is the efficacy of the human mind.
2. The human mind can no more justify itself than one may pull oneself by bootstraps.
3. The human mind has relations with “things;” either “creations” of the human mind (idealism, therefore irrational) or independent of the human mind (classical realism, thus rational, the Founders’ position).
If you embrace idealism, and understand its implications, the Constitution can be used to justify anything — eventually — because there is no certainty in the mind’s relation to what is not the mind; thus, unalienable rights e.g., become absurdities, all then is based on how people feel.
Unfortunately, feelings change, sometimes dramatically in short amounts of time. Sentiment informing/determining law is the antithesis of a rule of law.
4. U.S. Constitution presupposes a rational moral order — as the necessary ground for establishing rule of law.
5. The preamble of the U.S. Constitution presupposes — as a necessary condition for approximation of its principles to be realized — dispositions of virtue, i.e., moral dispositions, i.e., beings which limit their appetites to their “final-causality” which is natural law.
6. The Founders — much wiser than all of us moderns — knew that human sentiment is in flux, and can be “pied-pipered” into sentimentally surrendering the constitutional checks and balances — as we have — for transient un-reason.
7. We arrogant modern dimwits have created our problems (e.g., financial collapse, political grid-lock, ubiquity of government, etc.) because we think we know better than the founders — issues like homosexual “marriage” would never reach federal courts if states appointed senators — as they did before the 17th Amendment’s ratification.
Thomas J. Donegan
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Do views on baptism match Bible’s words?
Editor, The News: In regard to the Rev. Randy Crum. He must be reading a different Bible than the Christian religion. What theologian taught him his version?
Aging agency offers help with Medicare
Editor, The News: I am writing in response to the woman who reported problems she was encountering with the high out-of-pocket costs of her Medicare supplemental insurance plan in last Saturday’s “The People Speak.”
‘State Fair’ displays Playhouse possibilities
Editor, The News: I had a delightful experience attending the New Castle Playhouse opening night performance of “State Fair.”
Dreaming of being local meteorologist
Editor, The News: I always wanted to be a meteorologist. I am never wrong or right and I still have a job. I provide data that no one understands while I am warm and dry waving my arms with that important suit and smug smile.
People should check health insurance
Editor, The News: I have paid the local hospital almost $1,500 in co-payments because my supplemental insurance was turned into a health maintenance organization, which was allowed to override my Medicare coverage.
In Bible, Jesus calls for people to repent
Editor, The News: Recently in the paper, Elton John said he believes Jesus would support same-sex marriages.
Scientific knowledge may be something else
Editor, The News: Science is knowledge derived by method; things scientific meet the criteria of science, but neither the criteria, nor the method are scientific.
Dog park supporters made big difference
Editor, The News: I just want to acknowledge News reporter David Burcham for his coverage on Jasmine’s park
Truth can be found only in word of God
Editor, The News: You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free — John 8:32.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form