NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
Answering Bonnie Humphrey’s challenge in a recent letter:
1. The undergirding ground of any argument is the efficacy of the human mind.
2. The human mind can no more justify itself than one may pull oneself by bootstraps.
3. The human mind has relations with “things;” either “creations” of the human mind (idealism, therefore irrational) or independent of the human mind (classical realism, thus rational, the Founders’ position).
If you embrace idealism, and understand its implications, the Constitution can be used to justify anything — eventually — because there is no certainty in the mind’s relation to what is not the mind; thus, unalienable rights e.g., become absurdities, all then is based on how people feel.
Unfortunately, feelings change, sometimes dramatically in short amounts of time. Sentiment informing/determining law is the antithesis of a rule of law.
4. U.S. Constitution presupposes a rational moral order — as the necessary ground for establishing rule of law.
5. The preamble of the U.S. Constitution presupposes — as a necessary condition for approximation of its principles to be realized — dispositions of virtue, i.e., moral dispositions, i.e., beings which limit their appetites to their “final-causality” which is natural law.
6. The Founders — much wiser than all of us moderns — knew that human sentiment is in flux, and can be “pied-pipered” into sentimentally surrendering the constitutional checks and balances — as we have — for transient un-reason.
7. We arrogant modern dimwits have created our problems (e.g., financial collapse, political grid-lock, ubiquity of government, etc.) because we think we know better than the founders — issues like homosexual “marriage” would never reach federal courts if states appointed senators — as they did before the 17th Amendment’s ratification.
Thomas J. Donegan
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Truth can be found only in word of God
Editor, The News: You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free — John 8:32.
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form