NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
It’s time for the pro-life folks to assemble again.
I’m constantly amazed at the single-minded, selfish naiveté of these folks. Their agenda is pro-life at any cost — except to them.
The Alpha Omega Center boasts that 85 percent of women it sees decide against abortion (probably because of scare tactics). If the women even contemplate abortion, they must have misgivings about being a parent.
In our society it is less shameful to belittle, neglect or abuse children than surrender them for adoption. Only 2 percent of today’s women make and keep adoption plans for their children. Probably more should.
Where are pro-lifers once a child is born? There was a recent story in The News about a 2-month-old infant who is now blind and in a vegetative state because her mother’s boyfriend got angry and threw her against a wall. Would abortion have been preferable to the future she now faces?
Where are pro-lifers now? Will they ante up the funds that caring for this child for the rest of her life will entail or leave it to taxpayers? Will they hold the mother’s hand as she grieves her child’s lost future? How many offered child care to the mother that could have prevented the tragedy?
How many pro-life advocates have adopted or fostered one or more of the 185,000 children in the U.S. non-relative foster care system, most of whom have significant mental and/or emotional health issues? Those children desperately need families.
It’s so easy to sign a petition, meet on the Diamond to rally, light the lovely luminarias and carry placards. When all of the pro-life advocates put tough, life-affirming action instead of rhetoric behind their beliefs, then they might have credibility.
Patricia H. Peiffer
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Truth can be found only in word of God
Editor, The News: You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free — John 8:32.
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form