NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
Reporter Mary Grzebieniak should have spent more time vetting her article, “Officials: Few options with drilling permits.”
Admittedly, Pulaski Township supervisors are under extreme pressure to approve conditional use permits for oil/gas. However, solicitor Richard Harper’s statement that “supervisors cannot turn down applications for conditional use permits for any but zoning-related issues,” is incorrect.
Act 13 included a pre-emption clause which prevented local governments from banning fracking. Soon after, Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court ruled Act 13 to be unconstitutional placing an injunction on that clause.
Grzebieniak did not attend the hearing in which I objected to the permit for a fifth well at the Whiting pad. Contrary to her article, I focused on water contamination, not Suzanne Matteo. I provided copies of an ongoing investigation by the Department of Environmental Protection for three households near the Whiting pad. For the health and safety of Pulaski residents, I requested the supervisors refrain from approving a fifth well until the DEP issues a determination letter.
Matteo’s testimony focused on the failure of the township to hold a public hearing for Whiting wells 3H and 4H. Matteo made several requests for documentation of a public hearing, but her appeals have been ignored.
The written decision issued by Pulaski states that Matteo’s testimony was discredited, but is done on the supervisors say so alone. My testimony was stricken from the record, but according to their own municipal planning code, there is no residency requirement to speak there.
Grzebieniak’s statements were based solely on the written decision as it repeats the same inaccuracies. Any story associated with Pulaski Township should be thoroughly researched. The Pulaski Township supervisors, who are public trustees elected to represent the people and protect the health and well-being of their community, have repeatedly abused their positions of power.
Indian Run Road
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Scientific knowledge may be something else
Editor, The News: Science is knowledge derived by method; things scientific meet the criteria of science, but neither the criteria, nor the method are scientific.
Dog park supporters made big difference
Editor, The News: I just want to acknowledge News reporter David Burcham for his coverage on Jasmine’s park
Truth can be found only in word of God
Editor, The News: You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free — John 8:32.
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form