NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
Pre-Socratic justice was helping one’s friends and harming one’s enemies.
A “friend” shared a common interest, but since all such interests are temporary, so were friendships. Note that such — is reality — absent an objective moral order; relationships — including relations of “love” are reduced to practicality.
“I need you for ‘X’ and thus, we are ‘friends,’ or thus, I ‘love’ you.” At the end of the day, that is egoism, and nothing more.
Justice for Socrates/Plato was a soul (nexus of impetuses) ordered in reason, i.e., impetuses limited in accordance with an (intuited, informal) natural law.
Aristotle treats “friendship,” distinguishing the practical, convenient relation from the moral relation, which is predicated upon a natural law — which Aristotle formalizes in Nicomachean ethics.
Aristotle — in formalizing the natural law — was attempting to establish a code of conduct that allowed for a moral common ground; he saw that preferable to “might-makes-right.”
Similarly — regarding Kant’s categorical imperative — he was not attempting to pillory sentimentalists (reason subject to passion) of any variety; he was attempting to establish an a priori universal moral code (since if Kant’s epistemology is true, the natural law is absurd) that would promote amelioration of the human condition.
If I am driving to town, a road, a vehicle and town — amongst many other things — are presupposed. Analogously, the U.S. Constitution presupposes many things e.g., a rational (moral) order, moral agents; ultimately Christendom. Christendom, is not Christianity, rather it is an accompanying rational (philosophical) worldview incorporating Aristotle’s thought; that, to which, Martin Luther ultimately objected.
With the Supreme Court majority decision regarding the Defense of Marriage Act, the court inanely invalidated itself as it an advocate pre-Socratic justice.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Do views on baptism match Bible’s words?
Editor, The News: In regard to the Rev. Randy Crum. He must be reading a different Bible than the Christian religion. What theologian taught him his version?
Aging agency offers help with Medicare
Editor, The News: I am writing in response to the woman who reported problems she was encountering with the high out-of-pocket costs of her Medicare supplemental insurance plan in last Saturday’s “The People Speak.”
‘State Fair’ displays Playhouse possibilities
Editor, The News: I had a delightful experience attending the New Castle Playhouse opening night performance of “State Fair.”
Dreaming of being local meteorologist
Editor, The News: I always wanted to be a meteorologist. I am never wrong or right and I still have a job. I provide data that no one understands while I am warm and dry waving my arms with that important suit and smug smile.
People should check health insurance
Editor, The News: I have paid the local hospital almost $1,500 in co-payments because my supplemental insurance was turned into a health maintenance organization, which was allowed to override my Medicare coverage.
In Bible, Jesus calls for people to repent
Editor, The News: Recently in the paper, Elton John said he believes Jesus would support same-sex marriages.
Scientific knowledge may be something else
Editor, The News: Science is knowledge derived by method; things scientific meet the criteria of science, but neither the criteria, nor the method are scientific.
Dog park supporters made big difference
Editor, The News: I just want to acknowledge News reporter David Burcham for his coverage on Jasmine’s park
Truth can be found only in word of God
Editor, The News: You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free — John 8:32.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form