NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
Pre-Socratic justice was helping one’s friends and harming one’s enemies.
A “friend” shared a common interest, but since all such interests are temporary, so were friendships. Note that such — is reality — absent an objective moral order; relationships — including relations of “love” are reduced to practicality.
“I need you for ‘X’ and thus, we are ‘friends,’ or thus, I ‘love’ you.” At the end of the day, that is egoism, and nothing more.
Justice for Socrates/Plato was a soul (nexus of impetuses) ordered in reason, i.e., impetuses limited in accordance with an (intuited, informal) natural law.
Aristotle treats “friendship,” distinguishing the practical, convenient relation from the moral relation, which is predicated upon a natural law — which Aristotle formalizes in Nicomachean ethics.
Aristotle — in formalizing the natural law — was attempting to establish a code of conduct that allowed for a moral common ground; he saw that preferable to “might-makes-right.”
Similarly — regarding Kant’s categorical imperative — he was not attempting to pillory sentimentalists (reason subject to passion) of any variety; he was attempting to establish an a priori universal moral code (since if Kant’s epistemology is true, the natural law is absurd) that would promote amelioration of the human condition.
If I am driving to town, a road, a vehicle and town — amongst many other things — are presupposed. Analogously, the U.S. Constitution presupposes many things e.g., a rational (moral) order, moral agents; ultimately Christendom. Christendom, is not Christianity, rather it is an accompanying rational (philosophical) worldview incorporating Aristotle’s thought; that, to which, Martin Luther ultimately objected.
With the Supreme Court majority decision regarding the Defense of Marriage Act, the court inanely invalidated itself as it an advocate pre-Socratic justice.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Letter writers ignore key details on issues
Editor, The News: In his claim that Hollywood is redefining marriage, Tim Erson writes as a follower of some visionary instead of a follower of God and His love for all His children (letter, Feb. 13).
Strangers provide aid in dangerous situation
Editor, The News: Recently, I was traveling on Valley Road in Neshannock Township. As I approached a sharp bend, I noticed an orange cone on the shoulder, which I figured was there because of a pothole.
Marriage is a function of state, not religion
Editor, The News: Marriage is a state institution with a non-integral religious component. The lines between these have become blurred.
Tax reform proposal would benefit budget
Editor, The News: Most valuable budget plan: Bernie Sanders’ progressive budget blueprint.
Trapping, neutering cats is way to cut population
Editor, The News: The feral/homeless cat population is now over 30 million. No, they don’t all live in Lawrence County, they are “just” in the United States and they are not at fault.
Changes in society are hard to fathom
Editor, The News: I’m 89 years of age and I am wondering what has happened to the society that was fairly constant during the early years of my life. You ask what’s bothering me?
Church soup team hopes it can return
Editor, The News: Due to some circumstances going on now at Shenango Presbyterian Church, the soup team has decided to put the soup making and selling on hold for right now.
Supporting fish fry aids fire department
Editor, The News: We would like to take this opportunity to comment on the Mahoning Township Volunteer Fire Department.
Father’s career shows concern for students
Editor, The News: One of the greatest lessons I learned from my father was not to pay attention to what others think of you, only what God thinks of you and how you think of yourself.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form