NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
It is my understanding that our school board is negotiating a new teachers contract.
Considering the economic conditions that exist in our community and country, it would be unconscionable for those representing the teachers union to ask for more monetary benefits and even more unconscionable for our school board to grant them.
Over the years, the New Castle school district has become inundated with employees who are family of school board members (nepotism). As a result, school district employees receive much higher salaries and benefits than the property owners can afford.
It does not make sense that one of the poorest districts in the state, that is heavily in debt, with a shrinking population, shrinking tax base and cuts in state and federal subsidies, continues the spending spree.
Some of the benefits that are in the present contract should be reconsidered. The 16th step in the contract gives teachers a $20,000 increase in salary. This means that a teacher who has worked in the district for 16 years receiving a salary of $60,000 in 2011 will receive $80,000 in 2012.
At this rate, in 30 years their salary will be close to $100,000 a year and their retirement pay will be close to $100,000 (not including their Social Security benefits) for the remainder of their lives.
This type of spending puts a tremendous burden on local and state budgets, resulting in higher taxes. In New Castle, the property taxes are already too high and will get only higher.
Health benefits are another area in the budget that needs to be addressed. The district pays $8,000 to employees who opt out of the district’s health insurance program. Their spouse’s health insurance picks up the medical coverage. Health insurance was never meant to be extra income.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Nation has survived without a moral code
Editor, The News: We Americans are proud of the fact that we have had a democracy for several hundred years and yet, we have never had, as a nation, a true moral code.
First Amendment provides for differing viewpoints
Editor, The News: I am replying to Matthew Finamore’s May 3 letter criticizing the newspaper for publishing Joseph Waltenbaugh’s letter criticizing gay marriage.
Homeowners group may be established
Editor, The News: We are optimistic about the progress and direction of our city. More residents are becoming involved with positive change.
Government is reason for Second Amendment
Editor, The News: As a Republican, an American and a man who studied history very diligently, I feel that I must speak up about a letter that I have reason to speak against.
Lost officer provided much to community
Editor, The News: Officer Jerry. That was what we called him at our LCARF meetings.
Recalling a judge with local links
Editor, The News: Gary Lancaster, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, died recently.
Stand up for New Castle by showing up at polls
Editor, The News: “Stand Up For New Castle.” There is no better way to stand up for New Castle than by voting on Tuesday.
Council fails to embrace value of city’s history
Editor, The News: Concerning the upcoming election for New Castle city council seats:
Community business gives back to people
Editor, The News: I wanted to acknowledge Clark’s Studio for recently assisting the Paws4ACause program that benefited the Lawrence County Humane Society.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form