NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News
On Jan. 15, the governor’s office of Pennsylvania announced its plan to permanently close the New Castle Youth Development Center.
Various requests were made by local politicians and union leaders to seek out viable alternatives in order to preserve hundreds of jobs in a struggling economy. The requests were met with reassurance there would be no closing, even as recently as three weeks before the closing announcement.
Looking past the more obvious devastating effect this closing will have on our community and the families residing within, how does an award-winning facility with the capacity to house 300 residents become so underutilized that it must be closed? What justification or logic is employed to close the most equipped facility in the state with capability to sustain the entire Youth Development Center and Youth Forestry Center System staff as well as the students to be rehabilitated?
A genuine reason is a mystery that remains to be solved, but will never be solved as long as the decision being made is a final one that does not allow investigation. If there is a logical reason to close the largest facility with the most to offer the youth we are so desperately trying to impact and rehabilitate, then even I won’t have an argument.
I challenge the state to be thorough in the decisions being made that will impact hundreds of lives and livelihoods.
The facility should not be closed until an investigation can occur by an independent group that can seek unbiased answers and provide evidence this is the best decision for our state. We, the people, deserve a thorough explanation which is transparent, not a smoke-and-mirrors pacification.
AFSCME Local 2353
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
National Anthem play was insult to listener
Editor, The News: We had a wonderful time at Pearson Park listening to a DJ play patriotic music through the evening on July 4.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form