NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
On Tuesday and Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments on two marriage equality cases: one regarding California’s Proposition 8 and the other regarding the Defense of Marriage Act.
On Tuesday, the Westboro Baptist Church protested in Washington, D.C. This is the group that carries signs reading “Thank God for dead soldiers” at military funerals. They believe God hates America and that we are doomed because of our increasing support of homosexuality.
Along with Westboro, the National Organization for Marriage protested in Washington. This group has lobbied against marriage equality for years, tapping into the fear that something terrible will happen if we “redefine marriage.”
There are those locally who share the views of Westboro and National Organization for Marriage. They talk about God’s will as though we live in a theocracy and the Bible, not the Constitution, rules this country. They should consider carefully the company they find themselves in.
We are governed by the Constitution, and that is what will be considered when the Supreme Court considers these cases.
Is it constitutional to give a right, then take it back? Is it constitutional to deny two consenting adults the right to marry because others deem their marriage “unnatural?”
Is it constitutional to create a second class with civil unions and domestic partnerships? Separate but equal again?
Is it constitutional that a woman was forced to pay more than $300,000 in estate taxes after her wife died and left everything to her, when, if she had been married to a man, she would have been exempt?
I challenge anyone rebutting this letter to do so without referring to Scripture or what “God wants,” because those arguments cannot be considered by the Supreme Court.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
National Anthem play was insult to listener
Editor, The News: We had a wonderful time at Pearson Park listening to a DJ play patriotic music through the evening on July 4.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form