NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
On April 4, an editorial appeared in The News concerning the Supreme Court hearing cases involving same-sex marriage.
The editorial contained some good points, but totally missed the purpose of the Defense of Marriage Act. In fact, the article actually made some claims that were inaccurate.
For instance, the article claimed that DOMA was, “… intended to interfere with state laws allowing gay marriage.” This statement is patently false. DOMA was not written to interfere with state laws. The fact that nine states allow same-sex marriages proves this. DOMA was written to protect states’ rights found in the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
DOMA prevents any state that does not want a redefinition of traditional marriage — an institution thousands of years old — forced upon them. DOMA upholds each state’s right to self-determinism — otherwise known as federalism. That is why DOMA passed Congress with large majorities and was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996.
The News’ editorial claimed that marriage is “a contract, a merger of sorts.” This is true of a civil marriage, or a civil union. It is not true of a religious marriage.
To the government, marriage is a contract. To the church, marriage is a sacred covenant between a man, a woman and God. This is the case in the Jewish, Muslim and Christian faiths.
No government entity, federal or state, should interfere with a sacred covenant of the church. We must never forget the separation of church and state as Thomas Jefferson defined it.
While the Supreme Court can certainly strike down the parts of DOMA that deny federal benefits to same-sex couples, it can still allow the rest of DOMA to stand. This protects states’ rights.
NEW CASTLE —
Editor, The News:
- Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor E-form
Send Letter to the Editor E-form
Truth can be found only in word of God
Editor, The News: You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free — John 8:32.
Obama’s border moves contradict security
Editor, The News: Over the decades, how many billions have been spent by the states to successfully eradicate lethal or debilitating contagious disease?
Poll regarding Obama defies the evidence
Editor, The News: I have read and seen on television that the results of a recent poll found the majority believed President Obama to be the “worst president” since World War II.
Benefits are perceived as positive outcomes
Editor, The News: In a July 14 letter, Russ Hall asked, “Why has the Obama administration stopped calling it Social Security? A Social Security check now says ‘Federal Benefit Program.’”
Bands were missed at local festival
Editor, The News: Recently, I have heard New Castle’s two great concert bands: The Red Coat and Blue Coat.
Bureaucracy blocks housing complaint
Editor, The News: I am not usually a complainer, but I have a neighbor who does absolutely nothing regarding house maintenance.
Consider the math of Social Security
Editor, The News: This is in response to the letter to the editor of July 14.
Where is evidence of war on women?
Editor, The News: War on women? What world do they live in?
Social Security fails to meet promises
Editor, The News: Most of us began working with the knowledge that, eventually, we would be eligible to retire and start collecting our retirement safety net, called Social Security.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
- Letter to the Editor E-form