NEW CASTLE —
Normally, we would expect professionals to leap at the opportunity for new training designed to assist with upcoming challenges.
So we were more than a little surprised to learn the teachers union in the New Castle schools is refusing to cooperate with a grant designed to aid training of educators in the district.
The funding, nearly $150,000, is part of the federal Race to the Top education program that New Castle qualified for. The grant is intended to assist with training and evaluating teachers.
Apparently, the training is part of the program. We also note Pennsylvania is beefing up its teacher evaluation system in the coming years. You would think educators would be glad for some assistance in dealing with such changes.
But the city’s teachers said no thanks, which is causing some consternation among the district’s administration. Based on comments in the New Castle News from assistant superintendent Terence P. Meehan, the idea teachers would refuse to participate was a notion they never considered.
Yet some of the comments made by Don Runyon, president of the New Castle Federation of Teachers, may offer underlying insight. While Runyon indicated teachers objected to some of aspects of the training, in that it supposedly dealt with student matters beyond the control of educators, something else seems to be bothering them.
And that’s the fact the district went after this grant without consulting teachers beforehand. We detect a little turf tussle here.
Intellectually, we can understand teachers wanting to be involved in this grant effort from the start. They may have a legitimate beef in that regard. That’s something district administrators ought to file away for future reference.
But we also get the sense the position of the teachers is akin to cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face. By refusing to participate in this grant, we suspect the big losers could be the teachers themselves.
We often hear complaints, from a variety of sources inside and outside of education, about the hoops teachers must jump through while contending with standardized tests and other bureaucratic changes involving classroom activities.
We sympathize with much of this. But at the same time, we see there are problems that need to be addressed. And one of these is in the field of teacher evaluations, where virtually all educators in the commonwealth receive routine approval.
New rules are intended to tighten this process, and teachers must contend with it. For this reason alone, we think New Castle’s educators need to rethink their position and work with the administration to hammer out any real differences.
Editorials
Our Opinion: New Castle teachers should revisit stance on training grant
- Editorials
-
-
Our Opinion: Lousy voter turnout is a missed opportunity
Tuesday’s primary in Lawrence County had its share of winners and losers. But — based on the numbers — the biggest winner has to be voter apathy. Countywide, voter turnout in the primary was a whopping 17.1 percent. In case you missed it, our use of the term “whopping” is sarcasm.
-
Our Opinion: Pennsylvania’s primary system is controlled by parties
Should Pennsylvania’s primaries be open to independent voters? That’s an interesting question and one we have explored in the past on this page.
-
Our Opinion: State audit says city school district failed to collect from non-residents
Audit information about non-resident students who didn’t pay tuition at New Castle raises more questions than it answers. At least so far. We expect more details when the Pennsylvania auditor general’s office completes its report and the New Castle school district provides its response.
-
Our Opinion: Make the most of your power to vote by casting ballot tomorrow
So what kind of turnout will there be for tomorrow’s primary? Recent history suggests somewhere between low and lousy. This year’s elections are devoted to local races, and there are few major ones being contested in the primary.
-
Our Opinion: Privatization of county jail is worthy of examination
Generally speaking, we support government efforts to seek more efficient ways to provide essential services. So we have no problem with the decision by the Lawrence County commissioners to solicit proposals for the private operation of the county jail.
-
Our Opinion: We endorse candidates for New Castle board
The New Castle school district is often a study in contrasts. There are complaints about the district on everything from taxes to nepotism, from test scores to ethical slights. Yet at the same time, plenty of students within the district excel. It’s a tribute to the hard work of those students, their families and the educators who support them.
-
Our Opinion: You should be frightened, outraged by IRS abuse of power
When people talk about government posing a threat to citizens, a common topic these days is unmanned drones. But a more credible threat may be the Internal Revenue Service. This agency, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing related rules, has the ability to make life miserable for the average individual.
-
Our Opinion: Our endorsements for City Council race
The city of New Castle needs help. Financially distressed and operating under Pennsylvania’s Act 47, New Castle must find ways to reverse its population loss and fiscal challenges.
-
Our Opinion: Court frowns on gerrymandering, but only slightly
Pennsylvania legislators have received the green light to put their own political interests ahead of yours. That’s a key point in the latest Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on legislative apportionment in the commonwealth.
-
Our Opinion: Study says distracted driving deaths are under reported
Suppose you operated a piece of heavy machinery at your job. And suppose it’s machinery that moves quickly with little effort. What would happen if you decided to take one hand off that equipment — while it was still in motion — and instead focused your attention on a telephone call?
- More Editorials Headlines
-
