NEW CASTLE —
Congress is taking a stab at tax fairness.
At least, where states are concerned. If you’re looking for meaningful reform of the federal tax code, that’s going to have to wait.
But the Senate has just voted for a bill that will allow states to collect sales tax on most Internet purchases. The measure goes on to the House, where the outcome is uncertain.
There is, however, no doubt that businesses with online operations tend to benefit greatly from current rules. Traditional brick-and-mortar retail establishments have to pay sales taxes, which range as high as 9.25 percent in some parts of the country.
Right now, states can require collections of sales taxes for online activities if the business has a physical presence in a given state. But most online sales operate under the radar screen of taxing bodies.
How much money is involved? The U.S. Commerce Department calculates last year’s Internet sales in the United States at $226 billion, a 16 percent increase from the prior year. Other estimates say states lost $23 billion in revenue because these activities were beyond their taxing reach.
So it’s relatively easy to argue the current situation is unfair, not only to brick-and-mortar businesses, but to all taxpayers. If states cannot collect billions in sales taxes, it’s safe to assume they’re getting money from other sources.
Yet saying this is the easy part. The hard part is establishing a system that not only allows states to collect these sales taxes, but also does it in a way that won’t discourage online commerce.
If this law passes, affected businesses would have to collect — and pay — sales taxes to all states that have these levies. What’s more, in some states, individual municipalities have separate sales taxes. Allegheny County is a local example of that.
It’s one thing for a business to collect sales taxes and pay them to the local taxing entity. But if you are required to do so for taxing bodies across the country, it becomes a real burden.
To counter that, the Senate bill says an online business must have $1 million in annual sales before it can be taxed. And states must create central taxing systems, so businesses aren’t sending payments to cities or other municipalities.
Still, critics of the measure contend too many smaller businesses will be hurt, stifled by the bureaucracy of having to appease so many different states. Having sales of $1 million sounds like a big operation, but that’s not the same as $1 million in profits.
We think this type of legislation is overdue, but we also recognize it must be done with care. And perhaps states — which also ought to be interested in fostering business — should look for ways to establish a sales tax collection system for online operators that’s more streamlined than the one that exists now.
NEW CASTLE —
Congress is taking a stab at tax fairness.
Our Opinion: Purchase of city house raises policy issues
Having the city buy a house on East Hillcrest Avenue because of neighbor complaints is bad public policy. The house in question was the scene of a shooting in October, in which three people were injured.
Our Opinion: Famed musician faces hate speech charges in France
Bob Dylan always has something interesting to say. Even when it’s not particularly wise or insightful. But Dylan still can contribute something instructive regarding free expression in the process.
Our Opinion: Wilmington district avoids trouble with tuition vote
The Wilmington Area School Board’s decision against giving non-resident teachers free student tuition was the right one.
Our Opinion: IRS seeks tougher rules for advocacy organizations
Americans have a fundamental First Amendment right to espouse and advocate their political views. But do they have a right to expect others to subsidize those views?
Our Opinion: Nation fails to take clear stand on drug’s medical use
To understand the shortcomings in putting state power ahead of federal authority, consider the matter of medical marijuana. Slowly but surely, states have been liberalizing marijuana laws. Every year, more and more states authorize the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.
Our Opinion: Senate Democrats use ‘nuclear option’ and moderation is the victim
Last week’s decision by Senate Democrats to limit use of the filibuster will widen Washington’s partisan divide. Democrats argue they had good reason to end the practice of blocking votes on judicial and executive branch nominees — and they are right.
Our Opinion: The curious need to post ‘In God We Trust’
Apparently, Pennsylvania lawyers don’t have nearly enough to do. So some lawmakers want to keep them busy. That appears to be the most likely outcome of a proposed piece of legislation requiring the national motto “In God We Trust” to be posted in every school in the state.
Our Opinion: Program will give Americans more insight into their culture
The information available on the Internet is nothing short of astonishing. Of course, a fair amount of it consists of little more than trivial nonsense, celebrity gossip and a seemingly endless stream of cat videos.
Our Opinion: Fate of nuclear talks with Iran remains uncertain
Hope flickered for a while last week regarding a possible breakthrough nuclear deal with Iran. But this week, things appear to be a bit more muddled.
Our Opinion: Whigs are attempting a comeback in America
The two-party system has dominated American politics ever since — well — the beginning. Although George Washington avoided party labels as the first president, even during his tenure in office, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists parties were taking shape.
- More Editorials Headlines
- Our Opinion: Purchase of city house raises policy issues