If you’re waiting for Iran’s hard-line government to collapse and freedom to bloom, have a seat.
This is going to take a while.
The regime in that country is not some teetering shell, ready to be pushed over by mobs of protesting students. It’s an organized, disciplined and brutal entity. It will hold on to power.
Idealists may look at the injustice in Iran, combined with the now-dwindling protests, and conclude that it’s just a matter of time before the good guys come out on top.
But those who hold power are not inclined to give it up. And there are plenty of examples where those in authority manage to persist, despite a lack of wisdom, good judgment and legitimacy.
In fact, it’s the fear of losing power and control that leads to self-defeating harsh actions.
That’s why change is coming to Iran. The only question is: How will that change go, at least in the short term.
It would be nice to think that the massive rallies have given pause to Iran’s Islamic leadership. The huge protests that greeted the country’s (presumably) fixed presidential election might make leaders consider the risks of denying all of those people a legitimate voice in the political process.
Then again, consider the words of one of Iran’s high-ranking clerics, Ayatollah Ahmed Khatami, who declared protest leaders should be punished “without mercy.”
If you’re wondering, that means execution in Iran, whose penchant for capital punishment is second only to China’s.
In short, Iran’s leadership must decide if it’s willing to respect those who believe the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was rigged, and seek accommodation with them, or if it will crush and terrorize this upstart opposition.
I’m inclined to believe the latter. Compromise is not exactly the sort of quality one expects from the Iranian government.
Still, the regime has an image problem, and probably realizes it. Where it was once able to play the victim and blame the “Great Satan” (that’s America, by the way) for its ills, millions of people around the globe have seen the images from Iranian streets. And they are well aware of how the government has sought to clamp down on the free flow of information — only to be thwarted repeatedly by modern technology.
President Obama has kept his responses to the Iranian situation rightly subdued. His critics fail to understand this battle is one the Iranian people must fight. A strong U.S. reaction will play right into the hands of hard-liners hoping to make the U.S. the issue, rather than their own ugly actions.
And Obama’s measured approach will cause future problems for Iran’s ayatollahs. Efforts to silence the opposition through violent means will be noted by the rest of the world. In the Internet and wireless era, governments of educated nations need credibility to sustain themselves.
Let’s remember the Iranian government not only seeks to impose its own repressive religious standards on the people. It also has mismanaged the economy, creating bitterness even among people who might not otherwise care about politics.
There is no doubt Iran has a young and increasingly sophisticated population, aware of the freedom that exists in other parts of the world. Arrests and executions may stifle the push for modernization — for a while.
But not forever. An unjust system and a modern and demanding populace cannot coexist. The days of the ayatollahs are numbered in Iran. That number may be a high one for the moment, but the regime has planted the seeds of its own destruction.
Editorials
DEAR READER: Freedom faces long, uphill battle in Iran
- Editorials
-
-
High court forces lawmakers back to drawing board
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision to throw out a legislative redistricting plan exposes a fundamental truth: The mapping of House and Senate districts in the commonwealth have nothing to do with representation or serving the people.
-
Our Opinion: City hurts businesses by ticketing during lunch hours
Most of the candidates running (and now elected) for New Castle City Council and mayor last year said they believed downtown redevelopment was important. This was a common theme during editorial board meetings at the New Castle News prior to last spring’s primary and before the general election.
-
Citizens offer to take open seat on New Castle City Council
It’s good to see there is so much interest in serving on New Castle City Council. On Tuesday, council interviewed nine citizens who have expressed a desire to fill an existing vacancy. The only unfortunate part is that most of these people weren’t interested in the post last year, when it was on the ballot.
-
Second thoughts
County commissioner decides to take charge of prison board
-
Our Opinion, Part 2: Mayor’s hiring of his son raises more serious questions
If you ask New Castle residents to identify the biggest problem in local government, one word will stand out:
Nepotism. The term, of course, refers to the hiring of one’s relatives for positions, regardless of the fact others are equally — or more — deserving of available positions. -
Our Opinion: Why didn’t council keep Chief Tom Sansone?
Last week, a majority on city council refused to confirm Mayor Anthony Mastrangelo’s appointment of Tom Sansone to continue as police chief. For the moment, the city has no police chief, and city residents are left to wonder why.
-
Writers reveal ignorance of school board politics
Editor, The News: In a recent edition of The News there was a letter by James Smith that caught my attention.
-
Fairness is consideration in Jameson Hospital’s request to city
Jameson Hospital wants New Castle to give it a break. And it’s something city council should consider — if doing so makes sense, and if it is fair to all.
-
Proposal to cut size of Legislature moves modestly ahead
Efforts to streamline Pennsylvania’s Legislature took a step forward this week. But plenty of additional steps remain in what promises to be a daunting process.
-
Violence flares in Mideast nation as American troops depart
It doesn’t always make headlines in America, but violence is a regular occurrence in Iraq. Yesterday, car bombings in Baghdad killed 14 people and wounded 75 others. In the United States, such bloodshed would be a major event. In Iraq, it’s just more of the same.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
High court forces lawmakers back to drawing board
