NEW CASTLE —
Do you trust government?
Well, you better, thanks to a new U.S. Supreme Court decision that gives law enforcement — and ultimately others in government — the ability to access sweeping new information about individuals.
It comes courtesy of a high court decision this week that upholds the constitutionality of police procedures in states where DNA samples are collected from all people arrested for serious crimes. The fact these individuals are supposedly innocent until proven guilty, and the fact the DNA may not be needed in the case at hand, is apparently beside the point.
We suspect other states — including Pennsylvania — now will be inclined to adopt this practice.
The court reached its DNA ruling in one of its now-famous 5-4 decisions. But this time, there was an unusual split, with liberal Justice Stephen Breyer joining most of the court’s conservatives in supporting the decision. But conservative Justice Antonin Scalia sided with the minority, arguing, “Make no mistake about it: Because of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.”
The majority opinion in the case was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, considered the court’s swing vote. Kennedy minimized any civil liberties concerns about the decision, writing, “Taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee’s DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”
Except that Kennedy’s dead wrong. And here’s why.
Fingerprints and photographs serve very limited purposes in terms of identifying individuals. They tell government nothing else about us.
But DNA tells everything about us. It is what we are. To dismiss the taking of DNA samples as nothing more than another identification technique ignores a host of disturbing ramifications.
And some of these were raised by Scalia in his written dissent. In particular, he warned that Monday’s ruling, technically limited to “serious” crimes, undoubtedly will be expanded to others should governments decide it’s desirable to do so.
“If you believe that a DNA search will identify someone arrested for bank robbery,” Scalia said, “you must believe that it will identify someone arrested for running a red light.”
At a time when the public has reasons for being suspicious of government intentions and the scope of its power — ranging from IRS probes to the seizing of news organization phone records — you would think the court might see a flaw in widespread DNA collections.
Instead, Americans are given another reason to wonder what government will do with all that information.
NEW CASTLE —
Do you trust government?
Our Opinion: Law can’t effectively regulate political content
“It’s easy to tell when a politician is lying: Their lips move.” That’s a quote from the 1980s science fiction television series “Max Headroom.” And while we may not share that cynicism in its entirety, it’s hardly a secret that citizens need to treat many political declarations with a certain degree of skepticism.
Our Opinion: Ohio’s earthquake response demands Pennsylvania action
Confirmation by Ohio officials that fracking caused several low-level earthquakes near the Lawrence County border warrants attention. Yet it’s by no means clear that Pennsylvania is responding appropriately.
Our Opinion: School attack leads to inevitable questions
Another mass attack at a public school has people grasping for answers. They shouldn’t be surprised if no good explanations are forthcoming.
Our Opinion: Western Europe must embrace energy options
Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to demonstrate that he poses a problem for the West. And like many problems, Putin is one that may be best addressed by bypassing it.
Our Opinion: America may abandon Mideast peace efforts
President Obama may join other American chief executives in coming up short on achieving a Middle East peace. The State Department is sending signals that it may abandon current efforts to negotiate a key agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.
Our Opinion: Health program hits signup mark, but questions linger
So what are we to make of the latest news regarding Obamacare? The Obama administration says more than 7 million people signed up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, slightly surpassing early expectations.
Our Opinion: Ban of cash gifts to politicians belatedly imposed
Sometimes it takes massive embarrassment to get people to do the right thing. Proving that is the Pennsylvania Legislature, where this week House leaders ordered a ban on most cash gifts for members.
Our Opinion: Major study finds food link to lower death rate
If there ever was a compelling case that people should eat more fruits and vegetables, this is it. A study in Great Britain examined the eating habits of 65,000 people and came away with some startling results.
Our Opinion: Another census report shows local population drop
Well, it happened again. The latest release of data by the U.S. Census Bureau offered estimates that Lawrence County lost population in 2013.
Our Opinion: Financial failings in local education create concerns
We think it’s safe to say that taxpayers have high expectations of public school systems. After all, they receive considerable public funding to perform the primary task assigned to them — the education of young people.
- More Editorials Headlines
- Our Opinion: Law can’t effectively regulate political content