NEW CASTLE —
So now what?
Last week’s conviction of Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin on most of the corruption counts against her leads to the question above. What does the commonwealth do now that it has a convicted criminal sitting on the bench of its highest court?
Several options exist. Pennsylvania’s court system, for example, has a mechanism that allows for removal of judges found to have engaged in illegal or unethical activity. And the state’s constitution allows the Legislature to pursue impeachment.
That happened once before, with former Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen. But that was an agonizing process, and it tied the Legislature in knots, as lawmakers pursued an action with little precedent. Even if impeachment proceedings were to go more smoothly against Melvin, they almost surely would be slow and cumbersome.
And we suppose the same thing could be said about any action taken by Pennsylvania’s Judicial Conduct Board against Melvin. The process could take months.
This makes us wonder if any such effort is worth it. By the time the Legislature or Judicial Conduct Board is able to act, Melvin most likely will be sentenced on the charges she was convicted of last week. At that point, she automatically will be removed from office.
That’s how it works in Pennsylvania, as astute Lawrence County residents will recall from observing the Gary Felasco saga. The former Lawrence County treasurer — despite a litany of criminal counts and resultant conviction — was able to keep his elected post and its salary until he was sentenced.
The best thing to occur here would be for Melvin to do the right thing and resign. Sometimes that happens with elected officials convicted of crimes in the commonwealth. They at least have the decency to spare the taxpayers any further embarrassment and quietly give up their seats.
But it’s not required, as we learned from Felasco. So far, there’s no indication what Melvin will do. If she persists in claims she is innocent of charges related to the use of state employees for campaign work, the judge could hold on to her seat until sentencing.
One good thing is that Melvin has been on leave from the Supreme Court because of the charges against her. But that means there is a spot on the panel that needs to be filled. However, until she gives up her seat, or is forced from it, Melvin cannot be replaced.
Eventually, Melvin no longer will be a presence on the Supreme Court. That’s an unfortunate end to her career, but it’s an end she crafted for herself. Sadly, using tax dollars for political purposes — by paying state employees to work on campaigns — has been a widespread problem in Pennsylvania. It prompted the Bonusgate investigation.
Perhaps Melvin’s fate can serve a purpose if it reminds state politicians that abusing power in this fashion can carry a heavy cost.
NEW CASTLE —
So now what?
Our Opinion: No credit, big problem
Harrisburg is well known as a hotbed of political corruption. But sloth may run a close second on its list of vices. For evidence of this, we point to the latest downgrade of the commonwealth’s credit rating.
Our Opinion: Message from Putin
There’s little that’s known about the shooting down of a Malaysian jetliner near the Ukraine-Russian border. But one thing is certain: The incident and its aftermath are stark reminders that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a reliable partner.
Our Opinion: Although Corbett signs plan, many uncertainties remain
We’re not sure what to make of Pennsylvania’s budget situation at this point. Yes, the commonwealth does have a budget, after Gov. Tom Corbett signed a spending plan approved by the Legislature.
Our Opinion: Transportation funding suffers with everything else
The House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to provide continued funding to the federal Highway Trust Fund.
Our Opinion: New study suggests problem with some state shale gas wells
A recent study of leaks from shale gas wells raises more questions than it answers. And because of the growing presence of shale gas wells in Pennsylvania, it’s essential that both government and industry provide clarity.
Our Opinion: New round of Mideast violence threatens to expand
Anyone looking for peace in the Middle East will have to wait. Probably for quite a while.
Our Opinion: Impractical spending plan leaves state hanging
The fate of Pennsylvania’s budget for the new fiscal year remains uncertain. But one thing is clear, the state Legislature has bungled its responsibilities once again.
Our Opinion: Boehner, House complain, but refuse to act
House Speaker John Boehner says he plans to file suit against President Obama for overreaching his authority.
Dear Reader: Efficiency overlooked in Pennsylvania budget crisis
Politicians in Harrisburg are rounding up the usual suspects while crafting a balanced budget for the new fiscal year.
Our Opinion: State House passes meaningless measure
The Pennsylvania House has approved a $29.1 billion budget that includes no tax increase. The plan shifts some funds, eliminates various tax breaks and counts the privatization of state liquor stores as key ways to close a $1.7 billion hole in state finances.
- More Editorials Headlines
- Our Opinion: No credit, big problem