You can’t legislate common sense. But you can penalize those who fail to exercise it.
And then maybe they’ll get the idea on their own.
That’s the essence of legislation approved last week by the Pennsylvania House Transportation Committee. It would ban text messaging while driving.
It continues to amaze us that anyone would think the practice of reading and sending text messages during the operation of a motor vehicle is justified. But by all accounts, it’s a relatively common practice that has grown with the popularity of texting.
And there is no doubt it contributes to automobile accidents.
Specifically, the legislation prohibits texting by the driver of a moving vehicle. If the vehicle is stopped, texting is permitted. That’s OK — unless you happen to be behind a texting motorist stopped at a light who fails to notice it has turned green.
Violators would face a $50 fine, which would double in school and work zones and at emergency response areas.
This particular bill, submitted by Rep. Joe Markosek, D-Allegheny, also would prohibit drivers under the age of 18 from using a hand-held cell phone while driving. That’s a modest step. We continue to believe the use of any such device by drivers, regardless of age, is a road hazard.
We also are puzzled by another section of the bill that would prohibit insurance companies from raising the rates of violators. If these individuals are increasing the chances for accidents on streets and highways, they ought to pay higher insurance rates.
If not, then other motorists are subsidizing their recklessness.
Despite these shortcomings, the legislation is far stronger than anything else Pennsylvania lawmakers have produced in the way of distracted driving prevention. Some states already ban texting and cell phone use. And many corporations tell their employees not to engage in these practices.
For those who claim they can handle the dual tasks of driving and texting, our response is that a lot of drunk drivers probably believe the same thing. But the data tell a different story. Research shows that people who are texting have slower reaction times to events on the road. And if their attention is diverted, the chances of an accident increase.
Of course, all of that is common sense. Studies merely confirm the obvious.
By itself, a $50 fine may do little to deter texting. But we hope this bill — if the Legislature actually gets around to passing it — will serve as a message to motorists. When you are behind the wheel, driving needs to be your only concern. Otherwise, you place your life, and the lives of those around you, in jeopardy.
Editorials
EDITORIAL: Taking on texting
- Editorials
-
-
Congress acts to close information loophole, but is it enough?
It’s generally recognized that knowledge is power. That’s why some knowledge deserves equal treatment. Perhaps that assessment is most appropriate when it comes to information held by government. Government data and the collection of information, after all, comes courtesy of tax dollars, so everyone should have equal access to its benefits.
-
High court forces lawmakers back to drawing board
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision to throw out a legislative redistricting plan exposes a fundamental truth: The mapping of House and Senate districts in the commonwealth have nothing to do with representation or serving the people.
-
Our Opinion: City hurts businesses by ticketing during lunch hours
Most of the candidates running (and now elected) for New Castle City Council and mayor last year said they believed downtown redevelopment was important. This was a common theme during editorial board meetings at the New Castle News prior to last spring’s primary and before the general election.
-
Citizens offer to take open seat on New Castle City Council
It’s good to see there is so much interest in serving on New Castle City Council. On Tuesday, council interviewed nine citizens who have expressed a desire to fill an existing vacancy. The only unfortunate part is that most of these people weren’t interested in the post last year, when it was on the ballot.
-
Second thoughts
County commissioner decides to take charge of prison board
-
Our Opinion, Part 2: Mayor’s hiring of his son raises more serious questions
If you ask New Castle residents to identify the biggest problem in local government, one word will stand out:
Nepotism. The term, of course, refers to the hiring of one’s relatives for positions, regardless of the fact others are equally — or more — deserving of available positions. -
Our Opinion: Why didn’t council keep Chief Tom Sansone?
Last week, a majority on city council refused to confirm Mayor Anthony Mastrangelo’s appointment of Tom Sansone to continue as police chief. For the moment, the city has no police chief, and city residents are left to wonder why.
-
Writers reveal ignorance of school board politics
Editor, The News: In a recent edition of The News there was a letter by James Smith that caught my attention.
-
Fairness is consideration in Jameson Hospital’s request to city
Jameson Hospital wants New Castle to give it a break. And it’s something city council should consider — if doing so makes sense, and if it is fair to all.
-
Proposal to cut size of Legislature moves modestly ahead
Efforts to streamline Pennsylvania’s Legislature took a step forward this week. But plenty of additional steps remain in what promises to be a daunting process.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
Congress acts to close information loophole, but is it enough?
