NEW CASTLE —
At this point, the Lockley Early Learning Center project appears to be a process, rather than a controversy.
The New Castle school board voted unanimously last week to proceed with the project, which will create an expanded elementary school at the city’s Lockley site, while closing other elementaries.
The board’s unity on the matter is, of course, misleading. This is a deeply divided panel, as the previous vote on this project showed. And we think it’s safe to say the differences on the board aren’t limited to this particular construction plan.
At an Oct. 25 meeting, the board voted 5-4 against moving forward with the Lockley initiative. That move produced an eruption of anger and accusations, culminating in superintendent George Gabriel submitting a retirement letter, which was accepted.
But after a contentious meeting the following week, where visitors demanded the project be saved, the board reversed course. A major factor was the realization that the district would forfeit $9 million in local funds to deal with the consequences of canceling a bond issue.
That information, however, was available previously to anyone who wanted to fully examine the consequences of abandoning the project. Yet there was no discussion or questioning within the board on this point. Instead, there was just a lot of yelling.
We understand there have been differences of opinion surrounding the Lockley project and whether it would be cost effective over the long term. Advocates have argued that closing schools and reducing staff would produce savings, even with construction expenses. Critics have questioned the fiscal wisdom of a new building in a financially struggling district where property values are eroding and the student population continues a long decline.
There is nothing wrong with holding conflicting views on a school board. In many ways, it can be quite healthy if it advances the dialogue.
But one gets the sense there hasn’t been much dialogue across the gulf in the New Castle school system — at least not the constructive sort. And without a positive give and take regarding differences, what the district has instead is distrust, disrespect and a dismal level of basic communication.
This needs to change. Even with the Lockley construction vote in the rearview mirror, decisions still will have to be made on the project.
What’s more, the district now must contend with the crucial decision of identifying a new superintendent. Such a move holds the potential for great opportunity. But it also holds the potential for great pitfalls in a district that has communication problems.
This is an important time in the New Castle school district. All board members must step up and conduct themselves in a manner that reflects what’s at stake.
Editorials
EDITORIAL: Questionable communication New Castle school district requires constructive dialogue
- Editorials
-
-
Our Opinion: Privatization of county jail is worthy of examination
Generally speaking, we support government efforts to seek more efficient ways to provide essential services. So we have no problem with the decision by the Lawrence County commissioners to solicit proposals for the private operation of the county jail.
-
Our Opinion: We endorse candidates for New Castle board
The New Castle school district is often a study in contrasts. There are complaints about the district on everything from taxes to nepotism, from test scores to ethical slights. Yet at the same time, plenty of students within the district excel. It’s a tribute to the hard work of those students, their families and the educators who support them.
-
Our Opinion: You should be frightened, outraged by IRS abuse of power
When people talk about government posing a threat to citizens, a common topic these days is unmanned drones. But a more credible threat may be the Internal Revenue Service. This agency, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing related rules, has the ability to make life miserable for the average individual.
-
Our Opinion: Our endorsements for City Council race
The city of New Castle needs help. Financially distressed and operating under Pennsylvania’s Act 47, New Castle must find ways to reverse its population loss and fiscal challenges.
-
Our Opinion: Court frowns on gerrymandering, but only slightly
Pennsylvania legislators have received the green light to put their own political interests ahead of yours. That’s a key point in the latest Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on legislative apportionment in the commonwealth.
-
Our Opinion: Study says distracted driving deaths are under reported
Suppose you operated a piece of heavy machinery at your job. And suppose it’s machinery that moves quickly with little effort. What would happen if you decided to take one hand off that equipment — while it was still in motion — and instead focused your attention on a telephone call?
-
Our Opinion: Senate seeks to give states more taxing power
Congress is taking a stab at tax fairness. At least, where states are concerned. If you’re looking for meaningful reform of the federal tax code, that’s going to have to wait.
-
Our Opinion: Look at handling of bombing suspects is warranted
We welcome an investigation into the handling of intelligence related to suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing. That probe may reveal little of value.
-
Our Opinion: Right to know reveals intermediate unit problem
At this point, we have few details regarding the resignation of the director of this region’s intermediate unit. Apparently, there was a problem with purchases Cecelia H. Yauger made with a government credit card through the state agency that provides support services to area school districts.
-
Our Opinion: New wave of ethics initiatives arrives in Harrisburg
There may be hope yet for Harrisburg. Recent signs suggest that even lawmakers are grasping that the ethics situation in the state capital is taking its toll. Maybe they are hearing from constituents who are fed up with the commonwealth’s seemingly endless string of scandals.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
