NEW CASTLE —
If you want to gain an appreciation for great thinkers, read some of history’s major political philosophies.
Here you will find the works of Plato, Machiavelli, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, St. Augustine and many others. They explored difficult social issues and offered serious insight.
But if you analyze these political works, inevitably a question arises: How could these brilliant minds come to so many different conclusions about individuals and government structure?
Various explanations for this can be found. But it’s mainly because these philosophers were products of their times. The events they observed and encountered helped to forge their outlooks on life and their views on politics.
Yet times and perceptions evolve. That raises problems for those looking for help from great ideas in the past. Maybe those ideas derived from events that are no longer pertinent.
With this observation in mind, it’s easier to dismiss Plato’s embrace of the state and its dominance over the individual. Plato believed in a vibrant political culture, full of debate and exchange of ideas. Yet at the end of the day, he accepted adherence to the dictates of the state. This, Plato determined, was essential for civilization to survive.
It’s a notion that clashes with the concept of a free society, where individual action and innovation is something to celebrate and promote. Americans might take Plato’s conclusions and decide he was a fool.
But this ignores the times Plato lived in. He appreciated government and the rule of law, because he was well aware of the chaos and brutality that could exist outside of its protection.
Today, plenty of people complain about government. Much of it is typical human grumbling about things that don’t go right. However, some of it stems from a view that government is the cause of our problems, not a potential for solution.
When you look at today’s gridlock in Washington, and the utter inability of politicians to hammer out practical agreements on matters pertaining to budgets and taxes, you can understand how people can give up on government. This level of incompetence — and it is incompetence, not principled partisanship — fuels individuals who think it’s best to privatize all aspects of government, buy some guns and embrace self-sufficiency.
Yet a fundamental mistake is made today by many people who criticize government. They overlook the fact they are criticizing themselves. Even for Plato, politics and government weren’t some far-off system of arbitrary authority. They derived from the active participation of citizens who shaped government to fit their needs.
And despite the passage of millennia, this hasn’t changed. Government is a tool we control. When it fails to do our bidding — and we refuse to demand better — who’s to blame?
Editorials
Mitchel Olszak: Political lessons from distant past hold value today
- Editorials
-
-
Our Opinion: New Castle school tuition travesty? Enough is enough
New Castle’s taxpayers deserve an explanation. And some money. With the release of the latest Pennsylvania auditor general’s report on the city’s schools, it’s been revealed that some district employees abused taxpayers to the tune of more than $110,000.
-
Our Opinion: IRS probe may reveal multiple problems
When a murky scandal is investigated, the goal is to obtain clarity, as well as to right any wrongs. But reaching such a conclusion can be a tortuous process. And so it is with the current probe of allegations of political targeting by the Internal Revenue Service.
-
Our Opinion: Supreme Court rejects patents on human coding
We can all take comfort in knowing we still retain the rights to our own genetic material. That might seem to be obvious, but a case before the U.S. Supreme Court involved questions over whether private companies could patent human genes as their own.
-
Our Opinion: Vo-tech nursing program faces elimination in budget crunch
The past few years have been difficult financially for Pennsylvania’s education system. Tight budgets produced by an economic slowdown, weakening support from Harrisburg and an ever-increasing rise in personnel costs has created a fiscal bind for most school districts, those in Lawrence County included.
-
Our Opinion: Government’s seizing records a threat to liberty
(Second of two editorials): America’s director of national intelligence had a ready explanation this week regarding the need to seize everyone’s phone records. “Well, you have to start someplace,” James Clapper told NBC News. Let’s stop and think about that for a moment.
-
Our Opinion: News leaks reveal dramatic scope of government data collection
(First of two editorials): In case you had any doubts, Big Brother is watching. And listening. And for all we know, smelling and tasting as well.
-
Our Opinion: Pennsylvania has transportation needs, but plan has problems
Spending money on transportation projects is a popular political pastime. After all, what’s not to like about programs that create jobs and make driving smoother and safer? Yes, construction is an inconvenience, but generally, the public understands it’s necessary for the greater good.
-
Our Opinion: IRS conferences take advantage of public funds
Things aren’t getting any better for the Internal Revenue Service. In fact, the credibility of the nation’s tax collection organization seems to be eroding away as Americans look on with disgust.
-
Our Opinion: Ruling assures sweeping access to DNA
Do you trust government? Well, you better, thanks to a new U.S. Supreme Court decision that gives law enforcement — and ultimately others in government — the ability to access sweeping new information about individuals.
-
Our Opinion: Declines recorded all across Lawrence County in latest data
Lawrence County’s long trend of population decline was highlighted when the Census Bureau reported yet another drop. Last month, the bureau said that the county’s population fell from 91,108 in 2010 to 89,871 in 2012. This compares to figures from 1960, when the county’s population was recorded at 112,965.
- More Editorials Headlines
-



