NEW CASTLE —
The planned construction of an elementary school at New Castle’s Lockley site continues to generate controversy.
Sharp differences exist in the community over whether or not to build the new facility. Critics contend it makes no sense to construct a new building in a district that’s financially strapped and dealing with declining enrollment.
Supporters, however, say that over the long term, the plan to construct a new building and close four aging structures will be less expensive than renovating what’s already there.
The project has advanced in fits and starts, in part because of differences on the city school board and because the first round of bidding produced results that were higher than anticipated. The district is now seeking new bids with a scaled-back proposal.
Even without the main construction contract in place, major projects such as this require assorted preliminary work. And the bills for those efforts have been coming in to the district.
Last week, the New Castle school board voted 6-3 not to pay roughly $38,000 owed to several companies handling early tasks on the Lockley project. The argument given in favor of delaying payments was to wait until the new bids are opened.
Why? The work in question apparently has been performed. And we presume it was performed in satisfactory fashion. What rationale exists for not paying companies that completed their agreed-to responsibilities?
Apparently, some board members are concerned the next round of bids for the Lockley project will again come in too high. We suppose that’s possible, and it may prompt the district to rethink the whole thing.
But even if that happens, it doesn’t change anything regarding work that’s already completed. It simply makes no sense for the district to delay payments that are due.
For one thing, timely payments for work performed is a responsible act. Everyone and every entity ought to pay their bills on time.
Beyond that, what message does this sort of delay send to businesses and contractors that might be interested in working with the district? If they conclude there will be difficulties prying their money out of the New Castle school system, they may pass.
Plus, there is also the possibility a business could take the district to court for failing to pay in timely fashion. That would cost additional money, and produce more than a little embarrassment.
We also note that when these matters were discussed last week, a proposal was made to handle some issues in executive session. That would be illegal on the part of board members.
The paying of bills involves use of public funds and needs to be done in the open. Any future discussions on this subject must be handled that way.
Editorials
Our Opinion: New Castle school district shouldn’t drag its feet on what’s owed
- Editorials
-
-
Our Opinion: Lousy voter turnout is a missed opportunity
Tuesday’s primary in Lawrence County had its share of winners and losers. But — based on the numbers — the biggest winner has to be voter apathy. Countywide, voter turnout in the primary was a whopping 17.1 percent. In case you missed it, our use of the term “whopping” is sarcasm.
-
Our Opinion: Pennsylvania’s primary system is controlled by parties
Should Pennsylvania’s primaries be open to independent voters? That’s an interesting question and one we have explored in the past on this page.
-
Our Opinion: State audit says city school district failed to collect from non-residents
Audit information about non-resident students who didn’t pay tuition at New Castle raises more questions than it answers. At least so far. We expect more details when the Pennsylvania auditor general’s office completes its report and the New Castle school district provides its response.
-
Our Opinion: Make the most of your power to vote by casting ballot tomorrow
So what kind of turnout will there be for tomorrow’s primary? Recent history suggests somewhere between low and lousy. This year’s elections are devoted to local races, and there are few major ones being contested in the primary.
-
Our Opinion: Privatization of county jail is worthy of examination
Generally speaking, we support government efforts to seek more efficient ways to provide essential services. So we have no problem with the decision by the Lawrence County commissioners to solicit proposals for the private operation of the county jail.
-
Our Opinion: We endorse candidates for New Castle board
The New Castle school district is often a study in contrasts. There are complaints about the district on everything from taxes to nepotism, from test scores to ethical slights. Yet at the same time, plenty of students within the district excel. It’s a tribute to the hard work of those students, their families and the educators who support them.
-
Our Opinion: You should be frightened, outraged by IRS abuse of power
When people talk about government posing a threat to citizens, a common topic these days is unmanned drones. But a more credible threat may be the Internal Revenue Service. This agency, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing related rules, has the ability to make life miserable for the average individual.
-
Our Opinion: Our endorsements for City Council race
The city of New Castle needs help. Financially distressed and operating under Pennsylvania’s Act 47, New Castle must find ways to reverse its population loss and fiscal challenges.
-
Our Opinion: Court frowns on gerrymandering, but only slightly
Pennsylvania legislators have received the green light to put their own political interests ahead of yours. That’s a key point in the latest Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on legislative apportionment in the commonwealth.
-
Our Opinion: Study says distracted driving deaths are under reported
Suppose you operated a piece of heavy machinery at your job. And suppose it’s machinery that moves quickly with little effort. What would happen if you decided to take one hand off that equipment — while it was still in motion — and instead focused your attention on a telephone call?
- More Editorials Headlines
-
