NEW CASTLE —
With his current term reaching the halfway point, Gov. Tom Corbett is preparing his political agenda for the next two years.
And because many of his priorities deal with budget matters, they are, by necessity, interrelated.
But one area highlighted by the governor and his staff during a session yesterday with journalists from Community Newspaper Holdings Inc. newspapers — including the New Castle News — was Pennsylvania government’s pension problem.
The problem with pensions is relatively simple. The state is dealing with the consequences of unrealistic finances with its pensions that have lasted for more then a decade. As a result, the state’s two major pension funds for commonwealth employees are significantly underfunded — to the tune of $41 billion.
How did this happen? You can go back to around 2000 for the answer. At that time, a raging bull market on Wall Street had persuaded some people that upward growth was consistent and inevitable. The state’s pension funds were flush. So why not boost benefits?
The answer came in the form of serious shocks to the stock market, particularly around the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and the economic slide known as the Great Recession. Suddenly, all the anticipated pension money wasn’t there.
And rather than deal aggressively with the problem, Pennsylvania — like many states — chose to downplay it, perhaps hoping the market would roar back and conceal some reckless choices.
That hasn’t happened. While the situation with stocks has improved, the gains haven’t closed the pension gap. Most attempts to address pension issues in Pennsylvania since 2001 have merely delayed the day of reckoning, not helped the situation.
And as is the case with most government pensions, Pennsylvania’s consists of what are known as defined benefit programs. That means regardless of how the market performs, state government retirees receive a guaranteed benefit.
Who makes up the shortfall in state pension funds if the stock market fails to perform as hoped? Look in the mirror. Responsibility falls to taxpayers.
Pennsylvanians may take some comfort in the fact Corbett continues to oppose any tax increases in the state. But pension costs must be covered. And with pensions being a substantial area of the budget, with expenses rising faster than anticipated revenues, that produces consequences.
Specifically, rising pension expenses squeeze out other government programs. Doing nothing with state pensions will eliminate desired funding in other areas.
That creates an incentive for Republicans and Democrats alike in Harrisburg to hammer out meaningful pension reform. We’ll look at some of the options tomorrow.
Editorials
Related Photos
Discussion
Our Opinion, Part I: Pennsylvania faces tough choices in covering retirement costs
- Editorials
-
-
Our Opinion: Make the most of your power to vote by casting ballot tomorrow
So what kind of turnout will there be for tomorrow’s primary? Recent history suggests somewhere between low and lousy. This year’s elections are devoted to local races, and there are few major ones being contested in the primary.
-
Our Opinion: Privatization of county jail is worthy of examination
Generally speaking, we support government efforts to seek more efficient ways to provide essential services. So we have no problem with the decision by the Lawrence County commissioners to solicit proposals for the private operation of the county jail.
-
Our Opinion: We endorse candidates for New Castle board
The New Castle school district is often a study in contrasts. There are complaints about the district on everything from taxes to nepotism, from test scores to ethical slights. Yet at the same time, plenty of students within the district excel. It’s a tribute to the hard work of those students, their families and the educators who support them.
-
Our Opinion: You should be frightened, outraged by IRS abuse of power
When people talk about government posing a threat to citizens, a common topic these days is unmanned drones. But a more credible threat may be the Internal Revenue Service. This agency, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing related rules, has the ability to make life miserable for the average individual.
-
Our Opinion: Our endorsements for City Council race
The city of New Castle needs help. Financially distressed and operating under Pennsylvania’s Act 47, New Castle must find ways to reverse its population loss and fiscal challenges.
-
Our Opinion: Court frowns on gerrymandering, but only slightly
Pennsylvania legislators have received the green light to put their own political interests ahead of yours. That’s a key point in the latest Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on legislative apportionment in the commonwealth.
-
Our Opinion: Study says distracted driving deaths are under reported
Suppose you operated a piece of heavy machinery at your job. And suppose it’s machinery that moves quickly with little effort. What would happen if you decided to take one hand off that equipment — while it was still in motion — and instead focused your attention on a telephone call?
-
Our Opinion: Senate seeks to give states more taxing power
Congress is taking a stab at tax fairness. At least, where states are concerned. If you’re looking for meaningful reform of the federal tax code, that’s going to have to wait.
-
Our Opinion: Look at handling of bombing suspects is warranted
We welcome an investigation into the handling of intelligence related to suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing. That probe may reveal little of value.
-
Our Opinion: Right to know reveals intermediate unit problem
At this point, we have few details regarding the resignation of the director of this region’s intermediate unit. Apparently, there was a problem with purchases Cecelia H. Yauger made with a government credit card through the state agency that provides support services to area school districts.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
