NEW CASTLE —
“It’s not my fault”
That was the subliminal message delivered by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito last week when he offered comments on the infamous Citizens United decision.
In that 2010 case, a 5-4 majority on the high court said government could not restrict the rights of private organizations to engage in political speech. As Alito noted in his address at a Federalist Society gathering, the ruling, which Alito supported, basically blocked the ability of government to dictate terms of the First Amendment.
All well and good. But in a world full of unintended consequences (but in this instance, not surprising consequences), Citizens United contributed greatly to the tone of this year’s election, an ugly deceitful contest where roughly $2.5 billion was spent propagandizing the American people.
And it was all in the name of free speech.
It’s worth noting that dreary political ads did not originate with Citizens United. Instead, this ruling merely upped the ante and magnified the misery in the nation’s modern campaign system.
Now that the election is over, I challenge anyone to show me how all of this money — and the “speech” it created — served the greater good. Did it educate the voting populace? Did it enlighten the citizenry? Did it shine much-needed light on the dark recesses of the nation’s political structure?
I don’t think so. Instead, I think it did little more than apply generous amounts of grease to the nation’s cultural skids, as both parties competed in a rhetorical race to the bottom.
Yet as a supporter of free speech, I don’t necessarily blame Alito and his brethren who backed Citizens United — at least not completely. The court, after all, is supposed to rule on what is and is not constitutional. It’s up to the rest of us to fashion a functional society based on the results.
Ideally, the purpose of free speech is to allow people with good ideas to share them with others. It’s this marketplace of ideas that allows a healthy society to advance, grow and readjust itself when things go off track.
Another function of free speech is to give buffoons the opportunity to tell us who they really are. There are plenty of examples of this in our society. That includes many of the political ads that ran in recent months.
But a key factor in making proper use of free speech is to challenge nonsense. It’s necessary to expose foolishness and discredit it. Otherwise, it earns a legitimacy it does not deserve.
This is where the American people need to step up when confronted with silly and offensive political campaigns. Tolerating them or ignoring them isn’t enough. If you are disgusted with the current state of campaigning in this country, fight back.
How? By letting candidates and their staffers know what you think. By condemning the vulgarities of the political system at every turn, regardless of the party encouraging them.
Remember, this is your political system that’s being brutalized. Isn’t it time you took it back?
NEW CASTLE —
“It’s not my fault”
Culinary Conversation: It’s a hole new recipe with this banana pudding cake
Last week, while on vacation, I was fortunate to have lunch out at three different restaurants. But I skipped dessert every time. Then Anita Guyton sent me a message on Facebook, and a sweet craving began that hasn’t actually stopped
Mitchel Olszak: IRS email fight clouds the issue
A scandal involving the Internal Revenue Service is now focused on missing emails. The absent data could represent the smoking gun Republicans have been seeking in their endless efforts to discredit the Obama administration.
John K. Manna: Harrisburg passes the buck to local taxes
By the time you read this, Gov. Tom Corbett may have signed the state budget. Or, he may have done nothing. Or, he may have vetoed it.
Culinary Conversation: Try these treats at your summer celebration
There’s no doubt about it — this is a busy time of year. There are graduation parties still going on, wedding and baby showers, engagement and birthday parties, bridal and bachelor luncheons, and lots of get-togethers.
Dear Reader: Efficiency overlooked in Pennsylvania budget crisis
Politicians in Harrisburg are rounding up the usual suspects while crafting a balanced budget for the new fiscal year.
Culinary Conversation: Reader shares more of her favorite recipes.
I think — no, I know — that I want to eat at Kristine Suber’s house. The busy wife and mother submitted eight recipes to Culinary Conversation this week. Eight. But today, there’s room for six of Kristine’s selections.
Mitchel Olszak: Iraq is good argument for fracking
A friend of mine is a big advocate of shale gas drilling. It’s not because he owns land and is looking forward to royalties. He owns no property.
Culinary Conversation: Just peachy! Time for fresh fruit pies
The peaches sat on the kitchen table for a few days. But when they were fully ripe, I knew the wait was worth it. They tasted exactly the way eating a peach out of hand should be — juicy and delicious.
Mitchel Olszak: Government officials can’t dismiss Sunshine Law rights
There’s a fundamental problem I frequently see with government. It has to do with the people who hold positions of authority. Too often, they seem to overlook the real reason they are there.
Culinary Conversation: Jell-O still a cool summer choice
Turning on the stove or oven in hot weather is not appealing. It’s summer, and lighter meals consisting of salads and lots of fresh fruits and vegetables are easy and healthy.
- More Columns Headlines
- Culinary Conversation: It’s a hole new recipe with this banana pudding cake