So yet another Washington moral crusader turns out to have feet of clay.
Sen. John Ensign, who has made a career out of pandering to social conservative elements within the Republican Party, admitted last week to having an affair with an aide.
The same aide, by the way, enjoyed pay raises and promotions during the time of the alleged affair — which may cross the line from tawdry to corrupt.
Ensign was the No. 4 Republican in the Senate, but he gave up his leadership post in the wake of this admission. Regardless of how leadership positions are doled out, you can be sure they will be held by people who are just as determined to tell us how to live our personal lives.
The Nevada senator has been among the Washington meddlers who want to pass a constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage. This intrusion into a matter traditionally left to the states is justified by the argument that action must be taken to protect the sanctity of marriage between a man and woman.
Considering Ensign’s current predicament, such statements would be deliciously ironic, if they weren’t so pathetic.
I won’t pass moral judgment on Ensign. That’s up to his wife and family to address. I will, however, pass political judgment. He’s a lying hypocrite who talks one way and acts another.
There’s plenty of that in politics.
The political left is now giggling over Ensign’s plight, while the right seeks to downplay it. In the end, nothing much will change. The same battles will go on.
I have a question. How did America, which supposedly prides itself on the notion of personal liberty — combined with an innate suspicion of those who wield power — come to the point where we expect our politicians to act as moral arbiters?
I mean, should we really expect the crowd in Washington or Harrisburg to be guiding us on such matters? Aren’t they the ones who need guidance from us?
We make a big mistake when we automatically accept as gospel those who bring up religion to rationalize anything they do. True character is best determined by conduct, rather than words.
Yet people continue to be duped by the likes of Ensign. And it’s not just on gay marriage. There are scams of all sorts, liberal and conservative, out there that the politicians routinely foist on the gullible.
But perhaps the worst are those involving the exploitation of religion. Personally, I always find it sad that a concept which is intended to bind humanity together is used to tear it apart.
This abuse of religion is as old as civilization. And it’s why I’m always suspicious of those who seek to foist their religious views on others, or bend over backward to link religion to more mundane matters.
Despite claims to the contrary, America has a long and constructive tradition of separation of church and state. There are matters of governance that have nothing to do with faith. Likewise, matters of faith aren’t the domain of government.
Injecting religion into government typically diminishes both. Watching the politicians proves that time and again.
Columns
Related Photos
Discussion
DEAR READER: Exploiting religion is popular in politics
- Columns
-
-
Lori Brothers: Get connected for better health
I am always happy when I see the lifesaving value of connection happening around me. It makes my heart smile when many people spontaneously unite. There is a feeling of excitement and community. Everyone gets onto the same page, when often the pages are scattered.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Scammers learn to feed off human fear
A few weeks ago, my computer went crazy. Boxes filled with warning notices and ominous-looking yellow triangles popped up on my screen, to tell me my system was filled with dangerous viruses. I was in imminent danger of having all sorts of personal information, passwords and financial data stolen.
-
John K. Manna: State Supreme Court explains fault with redistricting plan
A couple of things: We finally have an opinion. A week after it threw out a redistricting plan for state legislative districts, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its opinion yesterday.
-
Dave Ramsey: Proper insurance can transfer risk
“Dave Says" is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey's radio program, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
-
Lori Brothers: Organic is good, but it’s not always necessary
How often do you have a great conversation with your produce man? I encourage it. I got quite an explanation about how organic veggies are handled. I also found out there are certain guidelines about where they can even be located to be sold as “organic.”
-
Mitchel Olszak: Does making the press the villain play over time?
As a journalist and editor, I receive a lot of requests for help. They come from people suffering from injustice — real or perceived. They come from people who are struggling to grasp the finer points of modern bureaucracy.
-
Dave Ramsey: What’s your emergency fund range?
“Dave Says" is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey's radio program, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
-
Culinary Conversation: It’s time to get your orange on
Life is about routines. Get up, shower, have coffee, get dressed and go to work. Most of us probably eat the same type of breakfast every day. Some skip it all together.
-
Lori Brothers: Fleshing out ideas for skin care
It does appear that winter has finally parked over our little neck of the woods. It is the time of year when hands and lips get dry and chapped. Also, since we don’t get enough sun, we start looking a little pale. So what can we do for our skin?
-
Mitchel Olszak: Is county ready for change in government?
In Voltaire’s classic story “Candide,” the character Pangloss makes a frequent observation: “This is,” he says, “the best of all possible worlds.” Everything is wonderful, so why attempt to make things better?
- More Columns Headlines
-
