NEW CASTLE —
Most government problems, despite what a lot of elected officials may want you to believe, are easy to solve.
Plus, many of them know what the solution is, but lack the will to do it.
One of those problems is how to save Social Security benefits for future generations. The problem has been languishing for several years, so it isn’t as if members of Congress and presidents haven’t had time to figure it out.
Of course, one of the obstacles in the way is whether to continue Social Security as it is now or to make modifications to the program. Those modifications include cutting benefits or allowing people to decide on their own how to invest some of their Social Security taxes.
A recent Associated Press-GfK poll showed 53 percent of adults preferred raising taxes rather than cutting benefits for future generations as a way to fix Social Security’s problems. That’s certainly not an overwhelming number, but a majority nonetheless.
Only 36 percent, on the other hand, said they would cut benefits instead of raising taxes.
Raising the retirement age is another option, but that may be an option of last resort. People may be living longer on average, but there are no guarantees that they will be able to hold on to a job up to the age they can collect full benefits.
If anyone is truly interested in retaining the program as it is, the fairest way to do that is to raise the Social Security wage base well above the current level of $110,100 or eliminate it entirely. That figure is the ceiling for Social Security taxes to be deducted.
Although the wage base is increased periodically with inflation, it discriminates against people with lower incomes and those in the middle class who both Republicans and Democrats say they care so much about.
A person with a $60,000 salary, for example, will pay $3,720 in Social Security taxes this year. But a person with a $150,000 salary will pay $6,826 in taxes.
The higher salaried individual’s taxes represent only 4.6 percent of the person’s wages. That person will pay taxes on the first $110,100, but nothing on the remaining $39,900.
In sharp contrast, the individual with the $60,000 salary will pay 6.2 percent, which is the current Social Security tax rate.
For anyone who may say raising or eliminating the wage base would place an unfair burden on those with higher salaries, my response is that people with lower salaries are already bearing an unfair burden.
Columns
Related Photos
-
About John Manna: John covers politics for The News. His "Focus" column appears each Saturday.
Discussion
John K. Manna: Here’s one way to address Social Security’s woes
- Columns
-
-
Mitchel Olszak: Snooping threat to the free press
In “All the President’s Men,” reporter Bob Woodward conducts late-night meetings with a source in a parking garage. That source, Deep Throat (later revealed to be high-ranking FBI official Mark Felt), was worried that he would be exposed as a tipster in the Watergate scandal.
-
Culinary Conversation: A day in France— or close to it
Here’s some advice: If your spouse packs your lunch, never complain about the contents. I wasn’t actually griping. I just noted that it lacked excitement. The response from spouse was — our kitchen isn’t the Ritz Carlton.
-
John K. Manna: Data shows decline in number of primary voters
Voter participation isn’t what it used to be. That’s nothing new, but there has been a significant drop in voting here in Lawrence County. And it’s happened suddenly, particularly in the so-called “off-year” elections.
-
Dave Ramsey: Avoid college loans if you can
“Dave Says" is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey's radio program, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
-
John K. Manna: New legislative districts give advantage to local lawmakers
We finally have a map, and area state legislators have to be gushing with joy. The map, which reshapes state House and Senate districts in Pennsylvania, gained the approval of the state Supreme Court this week.
-
Mitchel Olszak: Toomey takes a chance on guns
How does a conservative Republican senator representing a state with a Democratic majority protect himself politically? One way is to take positions that tend to straddle the nation’s ideological fence.
-
John K. Manna: Shortfall in state tax collections means painful decisions lie ahead
I don’t deny that there are really smart people in Harrisburg who deal with the state’s budget and taxes. But I have to wonder what any of them — including the governor — think when it comes to taxes.
-
Culinary Conversation: Weeding out cupcake recipes
They’re everywhere. They’re everywhere.I’m talking about cupcakes — those individual desserts in their frilly little papers. They don’t require a knife or fork and sometimes the frosting is as delectable as the cake itself.
-
Culinary Conversation: Easy selections lighten up your day
A highlight of my working day is receiving a contribution to Culinary Conversation. Anita Guyton, a Volant shop owner, was kind enough to pass along two recipes she obtained from the back of a can of tomatoes — black bean salsa and cheese grits.
-
John K. Manna: Term limits again considered
Some things just never go away. One of them is the idea to impose term limits on members of Congress. Once a big deal in the 1990s, discussion about imposing term limits has died down to a whisper in recent years. But the idea is apparently not dead.
- More Columns Headlines
-
