NEW CASTLE —
It’s a common Republican Party theme:
Government has too many regulations. The rules it establishes and hoops it sets up for businesses to jump through impede growth and progress in our society.
A smaller, leaner government that avoids restrictions and burdensome rules would benefit the nation.
It’s a credible argument — one that can be documented in assorted ways.
So why, when it comes to Pennsylvania’s new Voter ID law, has the Republican Party taken a completely different tack?
In personal stories and court proceedings, we are learning how difficult this new law makes voting for some people, even though they are obviously qualified to do so.
Backers of the law try to say its rules are simple and it’s easy for everyone to comply with. But that’s not so. Perhaps for the average person, who has a driver’s license or other common ID, the law is no big deal. But not everyone is so fortunate to escape the clutches of the Voter ID law so readily.
This is why the law is still rattling around in the Pennsylvania court system. Even Republicans on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused to give their stamp of approval.
Instead, in what seems to be a move that gives the Corbett administration one last chance to legitimize the measure, the justices sent it back to the lower court for additional review, complete with a tougher set of standards.
Yet amid all the legal and political jousting, it’s worth asking the question: Why are heavy-handed regulations imposed on potential voters OK when such rules imposed on businesses produce cries of GOP outrage?
The answer can be provided in one word: Hypocrisy.
When the state’s Voter ID law was approved by a Republican-dominated Legislature and administration, we were told it was necessary to prevent voter fraud. However, no documentation of such fraud was produced. And when the legislation wound up in court, the Corbett administration admitted from the start it could provide no evidence of fraud.
Instead, the law was presented as a preventive measure, to make sure fraud never occurs. The fact it made voting difficult for thousands of Pennsylvanians apparently was of no great concern.
And last week, on a radio talk show, state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, the main sponsor of the Voter ID legislation, dismissed complaints about the measure by saying, “... we have a lot of people out there that are too lazy to get up and get out there and get the ID they need.”
I wonder if he would say the same thing about businesses that chafe under state regulations.
What we see with the Voter ID law is one of the consequences of single-party rule. Ideally, the sausage grinder of the legislative process gives us a final product that’s been properly reviewed, tested and debated, with input from a variety of interests factored in.
But when one party — Democrat or Republican — is in complete control of government, a key goal is to find ways to shore up power and weaken the opposition. That was documented by House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, who told a GOP gathering earlier this year that the Voter ID law would assure a Mitt Romney victory in Pennsylvania.
However, there is a good chance the measure will not survive in the courts. And instead of giving Republicans additional advantage, the tactic provides Democrats with ammunition to use against the party in power.
In the end, Voter ID may come back to bite the GOP.
NEW CASTLE —
It’s a common Republican Party theme:
Mitchel Olszak: Giving nutrition a new look
How many people look at the nutritional data placed on food packages? I mean really, really look at them, assess the numbers and act on the information.
John K. Manna: Son of football legend leads political field in poll
Jay Paterno announced last week that he will be a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor in the May primary. Earlier this week, a poll showed Paterno leading the field of Democratic candidates for lieutenant governor by a slim margin.
Culinary Conversation: Take the cake and pass the pie
It’s a new month. And it’s time to be thinking about replacing the snowblowers with lawn mowers. But March can be brutal. There’s a saying that in western Pennsylvania, we can’t breathe easier until we get past St. Patrick’s Day. Still, I’m thinking positively and considering all things new.
Mitchel Olszak: Legislative inaction puts Pennsylvania marriage in the courts
In defending Pennsylvania over a lawsuit regarding gay marriage, commonwealth lawyers are falling back on what little they have. They note that last year’s Supreme Court decision involving the federal Defense of Marriage Act did not order states to require gay weddings.
John K. Manna: Distressed status gives city more revenue sources
New Castle’s population decline over the years has been well documented. It may be small consolation, but most cities in the Northeast have experienced a migration of residents to the suburbs or the Sun Belt over the last 50 years or so.
Culinary Conversation: Yes, soup for you! Try some!
The groundhog said six more weeks of winter, and nobody is going to argue with his assessment. The upside is — we’re closer to daffodils, the swallows returning to Capistrano and sooner rather than later, gardening. There’s already been a glimmer of spring’s promises this week.
Mitchel Olszak: America’s problem with equality
What does it mean to be equal in America? It’s a deceptively complex question, because we know people aren’t equal. Some are more intelligent than others.
Culinary Conversation: Cherries can help make Presidents Day sweet as pie
Monday is Presidents Day. Granted, most of us don’t celebrate like we do on the Fourth of July and Christmas. Some get the day off, though, which is a mini-celebration in itself.
John K. Manna: Governor’s stances appear to shift over time
Where did Gov. Tom Corbett get his ideas? I don’t know if anyone has ever asked that question, but it came to me this week after reading a column written by G. Terry Madonna and Michael L. Young.
Culinary Conversation: It’s time for some Valentine’s Day sweetness
After only a few seconds of thought, I’ve come to a conclusion. There’s isn’t anything in the food world much more wonderful than chocolate. My love affair with chocolate began at a very young age.
- More Columns Headlines
- Mitchel Olszak: Giving nutrition a new look