NEW CASTLE —
It’s a common Republican Party theme:
Government has too many regulations. The rules it establishes and hoops it sets up for businesses to jump through impede growth and progress in our society.
A smaller, leaner government that avoids restrictions and burdensome rules would benefit the nation.
It’s a credible argument — one that can be documented in assorted ways.
So why, when it comes to Pennsylvania’s new Voter ID law, has the Republican Party taken a completely different tack?
In personal stories and court proceedings, we are learning how difficult this new law makes voting for some people, even though they are obviously qualified to do so.
Backers of the law try to say its rules are simple and it’s easy for everyone to comply with. But that’s not so. Perhaps for the average person, who has a driver’s license or other common ID, the law is no big deal. But not everyone is so fortunate to escape the clutches of the Voter ID law so readily.
This is why the law is still rattling around in the Pennsylvania court system. Even Republicans on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused to give their stamp of approval.
Instead, in what seems to be a move that gives the Corbett administration one last chance to legitimize the measure, the justices sent it back to the lower court for additional review, complete with a tougher set of standards.
Yet amid all the legal and political jousting, it’s worth asking the question: Why are heavy-handed regulations imposed on potential voters OK when such rules imposed on businesses produce cries of GOP outrage?
The answer can be provided in one word: Hypocrisy.
When the state’s Voter ID law was approved by a Republican-dominated Legislature and administration, we were told it was necessary to prevent voter fraud. However, no documentation of such fraud was produced. And when the legislation wound up in court, the Corbett administration admitted from the start it could provide no evidence of fraud.
Instead, the law was presented as a preventive measure, to make sure fraud never occurs. The fact it made voting difficult for thousands of Pennsylvanians apparently was of no great concern.
And last week, on a radio talk show, state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, the main sponsor of the Voter ID legislation, dismissed complaints about the measure by saying, “... we have a lot of people out there that are too lazy to get up and get out there and get the ID they need.”
I wonder if he would say the same thing about businesses that chafe under state regulations.
What we see with the Voter ID law is one of the consequences of single-party rule. Ideally, the sausage grinder of the legislative process gives us a final product that’s been properly reviewed, tested and debated, with input from a variety of interests factored in.
But when one party — Democrat or Republican — is in complete control of government, a key goal is to find ways to shore up power and weaken the opposition. That was documented by House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, who told a GOP gathering earlier this year that the Voter ID law would assure a Mitt Romney victory in Pennsylvania.
However, there is a good chance the measure will not survive in the courts. And instead of giving Republicans additional advantage, the tactic provides Democrats with ammunition to use against the party in power.
In the end, Voter ID may come back to bite the GOP.
NEW CASTLE —
It’s a common Republican Party theme:
Mitchel Olszak: Observing the stock market prompts lots of confusion
A casual observer of Wall Street may conclude investors in American stocks are insane. Perhaps that’s because many of them are. Or at least their financial decisions appear to support this contention.
John K. Manna: Party labels shouldn’t matter in local contests
Anything is possible in elections, but often improbable when it comes to school board races in Pennsylvania. In the Nov. 5 election, voters went to the polls in six of the eight school districts in Lawrence County and were faced with little choice.
Dave Ramsey: Where to keep the emergency fund?
“Dave Says” is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey’s radio progam, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
Mitchel Olszak: Personal skepticism is best defense against scams
The caller said she had been targeted by a telephone scam. She wanted me to put something in the paper to warn others. I asked if she had contacted police about the matter.
John K. Manna: State finally has road, bridge repair plan
Pennsylvania finally has a program in place to fix roads and bridges and provide more money for mass transit. The massive undertaking — pushed by Republican Gov. Tom Corbett — will cost about $2.3 million per year, most of which will be paid by motorists in the form of increases in gas prices at the pump and fees.
Culinary Conversation: Authors share recipes deer to them
If you want the most knowledgeable information about a subject, go to the authority. In this case, the expert on cooking with venison — deer meat — is Ellwood City’s Steve Loder. He and his wife, Gale, are the authors of “Quality Venison Cookbook — Great Recipes from the Kitchen of Steve and Gale Loder.”
John K. Manna: Three former governors give their endorsements
Another election is history, which means another election campaign season is under way. Actually, some Democratic candidates running in next year’s gubernatorial contest couldn’t wait and began campaigning months before this year’s election.
Culinary Conversation: My, oh my, it’s pie!
Making a pie crust can result in one of two things. You’ll either be remembered as the king or queen every time the word pastry is mentioned. Or you won’t. For some, that age-old cliché “easy as pie” is not that simple.
Mitchel Olszak: Autumn becomes the time to report for leaf duty
This time of year, I find myself frequently looking skyward. I’m not pondering the clouds, anticipating snow or scanning for NSA drones. Rather, I’m looking at the trees.
Culinary Conversation: Time to plan Thanksgiving meal
The calendar doesn’t lie. Thanksgiving is less than three weeks away. Then planning begins for all the other holiday meals. I have already made up a list of what we’re making on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. It’s a frenzy of preparation and two days of baking and cooking, but I wouldn’t change any of it for the world.
- More Columns Headlines
- Mitchel Olszak: Observing the stock market prompts lots of confusion