NEW CASTLE —
Who guards the guardians?
It’s a question that dates back at least to ancient Rome. It refers to the notion that someone ought to be keeping an eye on the folks who wield power in society.
To some extent, it’s the role of the press to guard the guardians (i.e., politicians) in our society. But to a larger degree, that task ultimately falls upon the citizens themselves.
I often tell people that the only thing newspapers really do is print words. It’s up to others to read those words and respond. The most significant news story in the world is useless if no one bothers to read or react to it.
In a democratic society, it’s essential that citizens serve as the guards of the guardians, demanding proper conduct. Otherwise, government can deteriorate into dictatorship.
Or it can unravel into an incompetent mess. Sort of what we have now.
In the field of journalism — along with certain nonprofit or public interest organizations — a new line of work has arisen related to politics. It’s called the fact checker.
It has become a mini industry, as statements by political candidates and campaign commercials are scrutinized for their content in terms of accuracy. Not surprisingly, fact checkers find fault with what politicians of all stripes are telling the American people.
It’s not that these politicians are lying — at least not blatantly so. Instead, they massage the truth, put their own spin on reality or leave out key details the public ought to know.
Considering all the charges and counter charges made in the current presidential campaign — particularly in terms of who’s giving the American people the straight story — you would think that fact checkers would be warmly welcomed by the voters looking for clarity and accuracy.
But surveys suggest that’s not the case. Information produced by fact checkers seems to have little impact on the electorate. And politicians are taking notice.
This is obvious when you look at the criticisms fact checkers make about assorted campaign ads. Often, these ads are dismantled by fact checkers, but the campaigns continue to run them. The declarations of fact checkers are dismissed as inconsequential.
Why? There are a couple of possibilities. One is that voters are every bit as partisan as the candidates. They don’t want nuance or insight. They merely want confirmation of their ideological views and they reject everything else.
Another is that with fact checkers serving to discredit both parties, no one’s left to believe in. When everybody’s blowing smoke in your face, how do you locate an honest candidate?
Unfortunately, this tainted political environment allows the distortions to persist. The politicians have no incentive to tell the truth if the voters are throwing up their hands in defeat.
So neither party will tell you hard, ugly decisions have to be made with the federal budget, mainly because you don’t want to hear that. Instead, voters will latch on to ideologically pleasing rhetoric that implies the nation’s fiscal problems can be resolved with a few relatively painless adjustments and perhaps a little pixie dust.
The real fact is that Republicans and Democrats both are letting this nation down. And the American people are allowing it to happen.
NEW CASTLE —
Who guards the guardians?
Culinary Conversation: Think globally, cook locally
Another set of bookshelves might be necessary at my house very soon. It’s been a bountiful week. Edie Majesky of New Castle, who I have known most of my life, is aware of how much I love collecting old cookbooks.
Heartbleed raises the stakes on Internet security
My column last week dealt with Internet and related scams, along with steps people can take to protect themselves. Today’s column could be termed Part 2 of that topic, albeit from a different angle.
John K. Manna: Proposals in Harrisburg fail to reflect reality
My, how time flies. The city of New Castle is in already in its eighth year as a distressed municipality under state Act 47.
Lugene Hudson: Celebrate Easter like Helen Martin
What’s cookin? That’s one of our favorite questions at Culinary Conversation. We love when readers share some of their favorites. This week, Helen Martin of New Castle stepped up to the plate to answer that question regarding Easter dinners.
Mitchel Olszak: There’s no reason to be surprised by modern scams
P.T. Barnum once observed that there is a sucker born every minute. Judging from the people who complain about being caught up in computer scams, I think he was too conservative in his count.
John K. Manna: Decyphering results of state Democratic survey
It’s no surprise that Tom Wolf is far ahead of other Democratic candidates for governor, according to a recent poll. After all, Wolf has been flooding the airwaves with ads, effective ones at that, as evidenced by this Franklin & Marshall College Poll.
Culinary Conversation: From main dish to dessert, some recipes for your holiday table
We all have our favorite memories of Easter dinners. While bunnies, chocolate eggs and peeps show up in the kids’ Easter baskets, the dinner table gets to showcase all of those wonderful spring delights that have finally come out of winter hiding including asparagus, sugar snap peas, broccoli and carrots.
Mitchel Olszak: Doubting the basic intelligence of ravens nevermore
Every now and then, I find myself watching the ravens around my house. That’s because their behavior is fascinating, and at times more than a little disturbing.
Culinary Conversation: Go on; give someone the raspberries
It was my first bowl of red raspberries for the season. And I was jubilant. Plump, juicy and delicious to the last bite, those little nuggets of sweetness satisfied. After this stretched-out, dismal winter, I was ready for a little taste of spring.
Culinary Conversation: Greens, cakes among reader’s recipes
Weeks always start out better when something pleasant arrives in the mail. No, I didn’t win the Publisher’s Clearinghouse Sweepstakes.
- More Columns Headlines
- Culinary Conversation: Think globally, cook locally