NEW CASTLE —
Who guards the guardians?
It’s a question that dates back at least to ancient Rome. It refers to the notion that someone ought to be keeping an eye on the folks who wield power in society.
To some extent, it’s the role of the press to guard the guardians (i.e., politicians) in our society. But to a larger degree, that task ultimately falls upon the citizens themselves.
I often tell people that the only thing newspapers really do is print words. It’s up to others to read those words and respond. The most significant news story in the world is useless if no one bothers to read or react to it.
In a democratic society, it’s essential that citizens serve as the guards of the guardians, demanding proper conduct. Otherwise, government can deteriorate into dictatorship.
Or it can unravel into an incompetent mess. Sort of what we have now.
In the field of journalism — along with certain nonprofit or public interest organizations — a new line of work has arisen related to politics. It’s called the fact checker.
It has become a mini industry, as statements by political candidates and campaign commercials are scrutinized for their content in terms of accuracy. Not surprisingly, fact checkers find fault with what politicians of all stripes are telling the American people.
It’s not that these politicians are lying — at least not blatantly so. Instead, they massage the truth, put their own spin on reality or leave out key details the public ought to know.
Considering all the charges and counter charges made in the current presidential campaign — particularly in terms of who’s giving the American people the straight story — you would think that fact checkers would be warmly welcomed by the voters looking for clarity and accuracy.
But surveys suggest that’s not the case. Information produced by fact checkers seems to have little impact on the electorate. And politicians are taking notice.
This is obvious when you look at the criticisms fact checkers make about assorted campaign ads. Often, these ads are dismantled by fact checkers, but the campaigns continue to run them. The declarations of fact checkers are dismissed as inconsequential.
Why? There are a couple of possibilities. One is that voters are every bit as partisan as the candidates. They don’t want nuance or insight. They merely want confirmation of their ideological views and they reject everything else.
Another is that with fact checkers serving to discredit both parties, no one’s left to believe in. When everybody’s blowing smoke in your face, how do you locate an honest candidate?
Unfortunately, this tainted political environment allows the distortions to persist. The politicians have no incentive to tell the truth if the voters are throwing up their hands in defeat.
So neither party will tell you hard, ugly decisions have to be made with the federal budget, mainly because you don’t want to hear that. Instead, voters will latch on to ideologically pleasing rhetoric that implies the nation’s fiscal problems can be resolved with a few relatively painless adjustments and perhaps a little pixie dust.
The real fact is that Republicans and Democrats both are letting this nation down. And the American people are allowing it to happen.
NEW CASTLE —
Who guards the guardians?
Culinary Conversation: It’s a hole new recipe with this banana pudding cake
Last week, while on vacation, I was fortunate to have lunch out at three different restaurants. But I skipped dessert every time. Then Anita Guyton sent me a message on Facebook, and a sweet craving began that hasn’t actually stopped
Mitchel Olszak: IRS email fight clouds the issue
A scandal involving the Internal Revenue Service is now focused on missing emails. The absent data could represent the smoking gun Republicans have been seeking in their endless efforts to discredit the Obama administration.
John K. Manna: Harrisburg passes the buck to local taxes
By the time you read this, Gov. Tom Corbett may have signed the state budget. Or, he may have done nothing. Or, he may have vetoed it.
Culinary Conversation: Try these treats at your summer celebration
There’s no doubt about it — this is a busy time of year. There are graduation parties still going on, wedding and baby showers, engagement and birthday parties, bridal and bachelor luncheons, and lots of get-togethers.
Dear Reader: Efficiency overlooked in Pennsylvania budget crisis
Politicians in Harrisburg are rounding up the usual suspects while crafting a balanced budget for the new fiscal year.
Culinary Conversation: Reader shares more of her favorite recipes.
I think — no, I know — that I want to eat at Kristine Suber’s house. The busy wife and mother submitted eight recipes to Culinary Conversation this week. Eight. But today, there’s room for six of Kristine’s selections.
Mitchel Olszak: Iraq is good argument for fracking
A friend of mine is a big advocate of shale gas drilling. It’s not because he owns land and is looking forward to royalties. He owns no property.
Culinary Conversation: Just peachy! Time for fresh fruit pies
The peaches sat on the kitchen table for a few days. But when they were fully ripe, I knew the wait was worth it. They tasted exactly the way eating a peach out of hand should be — juicy and delicious.
Mitchel Olszak: Government officials can’t dismiss Sunshine Law rights
There’s a fundamental problem I frequently see with government. It has to do with the people who hold positions of authority. Too often, they seem to overlook the real reason they are there.
Culinary Conversation: Jell-O still a cool summer choice
Turning on the stove or oven in hot weather is not appealing. It’s summer, and lighter meals consisting of salads and lots of fresh fruits and vegetables are easy and healthy.
- More Columns Headlines
- Culinary Conversation: It’s a hole new recipe with this banana pudding cake