In the debate over health care reform, he who yells loudest, wins.
At least that seems to be the mindset of people who are showing up across the country at assorted town hall meetings hosted by members of Congress. News reports — especially those on TV and others desperate for drama — show people literally getting in the faces of politicians and screaming at the top of their lungs.
What are they screaming about? Well, the specific words vary, but most are upset with government in general and proposals for health care reform in particular.
Mixed in are the emotions of folks who obviously were on the losing side of the last election. You hear talk about the need to get their country back, while they compare current political trends in Washington to either Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia.
For consistency’s sake, I wish they would pick one or the other.
What’s happening with health care reform hardly reflects either of these totalitarian models. Rather, we are still in the relatively early stages of a legislative process where assorted powerful special interests have a great deal of money at stake.
And we shouldn’t be surprised that those interests want to protect their turf by muddying the political waters.
When Washington shows little or no interest in health care reform, the American people are up in arms over it. They object to the costs, the bureaucracy, the confusion and the insensitivity.
But now that politicians are responding to public demands, there’s suddenly a growing outcry from those who don’t want to put their health and their lives in the hands of the federal government.
Apparently, they’re much more comfortable with the decisions of life and death made by insurance companies.
I’ll be the first to admit that any time Washington seeks to develop major new initiatives, it’s a cause for concern. The rules and regulations drafted in the rarefied air of the nation’s capital don’t always translate well down in the lower atmosphere.
So I have no objection to the Americans asking their representatives tough, pointed questions. They should.
But these same people also need to understand the legislative process. Even though something’s being discussed, it’s still a long way from becoming law.
Most legislative proposals in Washington, Harrisburg and elsewhere never see the light of day. Exploring and examining new ideas — and putting them up for public review — is an essential role in a healthy open society.
Trying to shout ideas down without serious examination is not part of that healthy society. Instead, it’s a symptom of a populace that’s allowing itself to be duped by fear. It’s OK to be suspicious of health care reform, just so long as you’re also suspicious of special interests with huge financial stakes in protecting the status quo.
Consider claims we’ve been hearing about federal “death panels.” Critics of health reform — among them former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — have attempted to argue proposed legislation would establish boards whose members would assess the seriously ill and elderly, to decide who would live and who would die.
There are, of course, no such panels in any legislation being considered. But Palin’s defenders say that data collection and efforts at cost control sought in new legislation could one day pave the way for these death panels.
But that’s like saying theoretically, I could choke to death while eating my next meal. Therefore, I should never eat again.
I would like to think our society is guided by better logic than this. But the battle over health reform makes me wonder.
Columns
Related Photos
Discussion
DEAR READER: Health care debate is loud and ludicrous
- Columns
-
-
John K. Manna: Data shows importance of Philadelphia for Democrats
In the view of some political pundits, Pennsylvania is considered a swing state in the upcoming presidential election.
Maybe it is and maybe it isn’t. The Democratic candidate has carried the commonwealth the last five times, including 2000 and 2004 when Republican George W. Bush was elected. -
Mitchel Olszak: Another medical truth falls by the wayside
Everybody knows that if you want to lower your risk of a heart attack, it’s important to raise your HDL level. The term refers to high-density lipoprotein, also known as “good” cholesterol. It’s the opposite of low-density lipoprotein, the “bad” cholesterol that blocks coronary arteries and causes heart attacks.
-
Dave Ramsey: It’s my food and my roof!
“Dave Says" is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey's radio program, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
-
Mitchel Olszak: Politics of marriage makes lots of money
Excitement raged across the political spectrum last week when President Obama came out in support of gay marriage. I yawned. The news didn’t strike me as particularly dramatic.
-
Mitchel Olszak: GOP dispute is matter for the party, not the law
John Altman is someone I would describe as a good citizen. You may not always agree with him, but he is involved and active in the community in a variety of ways. A frequent candidate for New Castle City Council, Altman has never won elected office, but he keeps trying.
-
John K. Manna: County residents classify themselves in assorted ways
Here’s a fun fact about some Lawrence County residents. It’s a fact that I bet only a handful — a small hand at that — are aware of. And the fact is that 2,141 county residents have no affiliation.
-
Dave Ramsey: Short term or greater good?
“Dave Says" is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey's radio program, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
-
Mitchel Olszak: Lavish spending reflects badly on government
Boy, those federal employees sure now how to live it up. At least that’s the impression. Recent revelations about a 2010 conference conducted by the General Services Administration have made it a symbol for government excess and arrogance. The conference cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and included such expenses as magicians and commemorative medals.
-
Dave Ramsey: Frustration along the way?
“Dave Says" is a weekly column featuring financial advice from nationally syndicated radio host Dave Ramsey. His column is filled with timely, relevant questions and answers taken from actual letters and calls on Ramsey's radio program, “The Dave Ramsey Show.”
-
Lawrence Corvi: Marcellus Shale — a lot more good than bad
Lawrence and Mercer county business leaders recently learned more about how Marcellus Shale development is impacting our area. Most of the news seemed to be good, but those in attendance were reminded it’s still early in the game for one of the biggest stori
- More Columns Headlines
-
