NEW CASTLE —
Friday the 13th will likely have significance forever for Jordan Brown, his family and friends.
It is the day he was judged to be delinquent in the deaths of Kenzie Marie Houk, 26, and her unborn baby.
Lawrence County Judge John W. Hodge made the ruling against Jordan, 14, finding him to be responsible for first degree murder in the death of Houk and of homicide in the death of her unborn baby.
Within the next 20 days — or more if both sides agree — Hodge will announce the disposition, which is the juvenile court equivalent of a sentence.
Anthony J. Krastek, Pennsylvania senior deputy attorney general who prosecuted the case, said prior to the disposition, the county juvenile probation department will conduct testing to determine where Jordan will be placed for treatment.
The goal of the juvenile justice system is rehabilitation, unlike the adult system, where the aim is punishment.
Krastek said Jordan’s case will be reviewed every six months to determine his progress.
Under juvenile law, he must be released by his 21st birthday.
Jordan was charged following the Feb. 20, 2009, death of Houk, his father’s pregnant fiancée, as she lay in bed in the New Beaver farm house she shared with Jordan, his father Chris Brown and her two daughters, Jenessa and Adalynn.
Houk, who was eight months pregnant, died of a gunshot wound to the head. Her baby died of oxygen deprivation.
Jordan was 11 years old at the time. He has been in custody since then.
He initially was charged as an adult, but following more than two years of legal wranglings, the case was transferred to juvenile court last fall. Had the case remained in criminal court and Jordan been found guilty, he could have been sentenced to life in prison with no parole.
IF NOT JORDAN, WHO
Outlining his case, Krastek said he established that a crime had occurred and who could have done it.
“We established that a juvenile’s gun was used to kill the victim. Gunshot residue was on Jordan’s shirt and pants. The police focused on him because he was the most likely perpetrator. All other possibilities were eliminated.”
The investigation showed that Jordan perceived Houk’s daughters were treated better than he was and he was invisible, Krastek said.
“It may not have been the case, but that’s how it looked to an 11-year-old.”
Krastek said the evidence linked Jordan to the crime.
Few knew where the family lived, he noted., and there was only a half-hour window of opportunity for the killer.
Someone would have had to know where they lived, know that guns were stacked up in Jordan’s room, know that the ammunition for the guns was kept in Kenzie’s room, go into her room without waking her, get the ammunition, kill her, return the gun to Jordan’s bedroom and leave without leaving footprints or tire tracks.
Evidence presented by the defense, he said, “was not relevant.”
Krastek also said the case could have ended two years ago with the same result.
“We offered this, the defense rejected it,” he said, adding, “Jordan needs treatment. He has received nothing to this point.”